Herd on the Hill

Facts about Governor Culver's Efficiency Measures

2009-12-16T11:09:00.000-08:00

Nearly half of the options identified by Governor Culver were revenue "enhancements" not savings.

Culver Fails to Understand Iowa’s Budget Again

2009-12-08T11:03:00.000-08:00

Governor Culver today claimed that he balanced the states budget without using any of the one time bailout money received from the federal government. This statement is completely and totally false as illustrated by the nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency below. Either Governor Culver does not know or he is intentionally misleading the people of Iowa, either way it is unacceptable.

Last year over $616 million in one time federal bailout money was used by Governor Culver to balance Iowa’s budget.

State School Aid – HF 820 provided $40.0 million for FY 2009 and $202.5 million for FY 2010 to be used to fulfill funding for a portion of State school aid.

Instructional Support State Aid – HF 820 provided $13.1 million in lieu of State aid for the Instructional Support Program in FY 2010. SF 478 (FY 2010 Standing Appropriation Bill) eliminated State funding for the Program for FY 2010.

Regents Universities – HF 820 provided an FY 2010 appropriation of $80.3 million in ARRA Education Stabilization funds to the Department of Management for distribution to the Regents universities. Senate File 470 (FY 2010 Education Appropriations Bill) made total reductions of $80.3 million compared to estimated net FY 2009 to the Regents budget units under the control of the Education Appropriations Subcommittee.

Community Colleges – HF 820 provided an FY 2010 appropriation of $23.1 million in ARRA education stabilization funds and $2.5 million in ARRA government stabilization funds to the Department of Management for distribution to the community colleges. Senate File 470 made total reductions of $22.2 million compared to estimated net FY 2009 for general aid to community colleges.

Medicaid – HF 811 provided $110.0 million for FY 2009 and $144.9 million for FY 2010 to be used to supplement the Medicaid Program.

The Liberty Agenda: Putting People First

2009-12-03T06:44:00.000-08:00

Iowa Republicans are united in support of returning to the notion that it is Iowans that run government not the other way around. Since 2006, the final year in which Republicans controlled at least one chamber of the legislature, Iowa’s government has become bloated and unresponsive. The focus has become on what is best for the bureaucracy and maintaining the status quo, rather than what is best for Iowa’s families.

As Iowans have seen numerous times over the past several years, government is erecting barricades in front of them instead removing roadblocks to their success. Government has become too large too fast and it is time to make sure government is accountable to Iowa’s families.

Here is what Republicans will do if Iowa voters give us the opportunity:

Allow Iowans the Right to Vote on Marriage

While Iowans differ on the ruling handed down by the Supreme Court all Iowans can agree that the people’s voice has been silenced. There is currently a disagreement between the branches of government. A vote of the people will solve this disagreement. This single act by an individual has been held as the final arbiter in this state and this country for over two centuries. Yet this fundamental democratic act is being thwarted by Democrats who control the Legislature.

Republicans propose that the citizens of Iowa be allowed the opportunity to determine the definition of marriage in Iowa. This is a judgment that should be left in the hands of the citizens, not unelected judges or an unresponsive legislature. Iowans deserve a voice.

A Return to the Fundamentals of Government

As Iowa’s government has expanded, the role of government has changed drastically from one that focuses limited resources on priorities to one that intrudes into trivial matters at the expense of safety.

Since 1998, the final year in which Republicans were in control of state government, the bureaucracy paid for by the taxpayer has increased by over 4,149 employees. This increase has failed to provide additional investments into the men and women that protect us as we travel across this state. In fact since 1998 Iowa has gone from 355 state troopers to only 288 troopers protecting Iowans. This reduction of 67 troopers occurred while the rest of the bureaucracy grew and state spending ballooned to the highest point ever recorded.

Iowa’s government has become unbalanced and out of touch with what Iowa families need and how they want their tax dollars to be spent. Over the past three years alone the bureaucracy has grown to include:

7 new employees in the Governor’s office
2 new gardeners for the Governor’s mansion
20 new employees to collect more taxes
4 new employees to create a data warehouse that is not used
Nearly 1,000 vacant but funded positions

Republicans propose to return to the 1998 level of troopers within the next 5 years. While it took a decade for this reduction to occur, Republicans will be aggressive in identifying areas of savings that could be utilized to increase the number of troopers protecting Iowans.

The Iowa Good Neighbor Act

Synonymous with being an Iowan, is being a good neighbor. A neighbor offering to watch your child when the school bus comes in the morning or a grandparent spending time with their grandchildren are examples. These are gestures that can make a huge difference to a family looking to balance the demands of work and parenting. Republicans believe that government cannot be allowed to get in the way of Iowans who rely on family and neighbors.

This fall in Michigan a mother was singled out and nearly fined by Michigan’s version of the Department of Human Services for simply allowing the children waiting in her driveway for the school bus to instead wait inside her house if it was raining or cold. The state decided she was a daycare and attempted to fine her for being unregistered.

This brought to mind Iowa Democrat’s attempts in 2007 to force grandparents to register as daycare providers if they were watching their own grandchildren on a regular basis. Iowans, whether they are neighbors or grandparents, should not be targeted by the Department of Human Services for simply offering a helping hand. This is why Republicans will offer the Iowa Good Neighbor Act to protect Iowans from the intrusive hand of big government. If Iowans want to lend a helping hand by watching a child, they should not be subjected to nanny-state meddling from government.

The Iowa Good Neighbor Act will put into Code specific protections for family members and neighbors who are simply being good Iowans. They will not be defined as a daycare or a daycare provider unless they are specifically offering that service.

The law will put strength behind families and neighbors, not behind the intrusiveness of government inspections. Paternalistic, nanny-state policies are on the rise at the national level and Republicans want to make sure they don’t spread to Iowa.

Making health care accessible, affordable, and portable

2009-11-23T11:23:00.000-08:00

We are offering a set of bold, state-based initiatives to make health care more accessible, affordable, and portable.

Health care reform solutions need not come from Washington, DC. In fact, the best reforms are often those developed closest to the people. Iowans do not need to wait for national politicians to act. Instead, they can join with us in pursuit of a set of common sense Iowa Health Care Initiatives and solve Iowa problems with Iowa solutions.

ACCESSIBILITY

Patients Right to Know Act

As with any product or service, the more information consumers can access to compare the costs and quality of that product or service, the lower the cost and the higher the quality of the products and services they ultimately consume.

Consumers have been slow to embrace market practices to the delivery of health services and, as a result, costs may remain high and quality is often unknown.

We believe the information age provides a tremendous opportunity to dramatically improve access to tools that compare cost and quality in the delivery of health care services on-line. We will propose legislation to establish a statewide information hub that brings together both cost and outcome quality data in a searchable format for online consumers.

Cost and quality transparency will empower consumers to make better health care decisions in a way that maximizes quality while minimizing cost.

Low-Cost Catastrophic Health Plans for those Under 30

Iowans age 18-30 are known as the “Invincibles” as they often believe, given their relative youth and good health, health insurance is a product they do not need. As a result, when they do have to seek medical treatment it is often for a serious condition and very expensive.

In fact, there are 106,000 Iowans in this age group who do not have health insurance and account for roughly half of all the uninsured in the entire state. We will propose legislation that will encourage the development of low cost catastrophic insurance products that will provide base care for younger Iowans and limit the amount of uncompensated care that results when uninsured young Iowans need medical treatment.

AFFORDABILITY

Medical Malpractice Reform

No serious attempt at reducing rising health care and insurance costs can move forward without an honest attempt to address the issue of medical malpractice and tort reform.

We have continually championed the need to pass legislation that raises the burden of proof on medical malpractice claims and places reasonable limits on payment for damages.

Expand Health Insurance Tax Deductibility to Individuals and Small Business

Current law allows large employers the opportunity to deduct health care costs “above the line” – meaning a straight dollar for dollar reduction in their taxable income equal to the employer share of health insurance costs and provides a tremendous incentive to provide health insurance to their employees.

Thus, it should be no surprise an independent study shows 94% of employers who have 50 or more employees provide health insurance, whereas 36% of employers who have 10 or fewer employees offer health benefits.

With a significant portion of our population now working for small businesses or for themselves, we believe such above the line deductions for health insurance costs should be extended to all businesses and individuals, be they subchapter S corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships or sole proprietors.

Some estimates suggest an above the line deduction for health insurance costs may provide a 30% savings on such costs and provide a significant incentive to offer health insurance benefits to their employees. It’s simple: if it’s good enough for Wall Street, it should be good enough for Main Street.

Prevention Credits: Putting a Premium on Wellness

Prevention programs that encourage long-term commitment to wellness practices are proven to reduce demand for expensive health services and contain future growth in health care spending. However, our current system chooses to focus on imposing penalties on those who practice less healthy lifestyles (smoking, poor food choices, lack of regular exercise) through higher insurance rates rather than rewarding good health practices with lower rates.

These “prevention credits” will allow an average Iowa family to save upwards of 15% on their health insurance premium or $1,635 on an average family policy. According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services there is a return on investment of up to $4.91 for every dollar spent on wellness. This shift in policy will save Iowa families real money while reducing the long term cost of health care in the state.

We propose legislation to require insurers to offer “prevention credits” to individuals and businesses that can be used to reduce health insurance rates for those individuals and businesses that demonstrate, through measurable periodic screening practices, a commitment to wellness and prevention.

This “carrot instead of the stick” approach to prevention and wellness should encourage more Iowans and their employers to actively pursue the promised savings through participation in health and wellness practices that reduce health costs in the long term.

PORTABILITY

No Pre-Existing Exclusions when Changing Plans with the same Insurance Provider

Nothing strikes fear in the hearts of those seeking continuation of health care coverage than the words “pre-existing conditions”. We propose legislation that prohibits the denial of coverage or the imposition of coverage riders due to pre-existing conditions when an insured Iowan moves from one plan to another plan offered by the same insurance company.

The simple act of moving from Plan A to Plan B (for whatever reason) within the same insurance company should not provide an opportunity to base coverage exclusions as if the employee were accessing coverage with that company for the first time. If the company assumed the risk 20 years ago, it should continue to assume the risk without further exclusions.

A Who Knew What Mystery

2009-11-19T11:16:00.000-08:00

Culver said he found out about the initial findings Sept. 15, while traveling in eastern Iowa with Tramontina.
“Culver pledges to work with film companies to sort out tax credits”
- Thomas Beaumont Des Moines Register 9/21/09

When information was first brought to my attention last week about Iowa’s film tax credit program, I was troubled.
“An outraged Culver: Iowans will not be taken for suckers”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 9/22/09

Tramontina submitted a request for proposals Aug. 10 to find an accounting firm to review operations and expenditures of the Iowa Film Office, which is part of economic development department.

He hired the Clifton Gunderson firm of West Des Moines on Aug. 19.
“Film tax errors seen as early as July”
- Lee Rood Des Moines Register 9/23/09

On Tuesday, Governor Chet Culver in Cedar Rapids said at least three times he learned of the tax credit fiasco either "last Tuesday" or "last week". When I asked him to clarify later on during his news conference, he said he had heard about possible problems before then and that's why he said he directed his legal counsel to push for the audit/review/investigation (whatever the proper term would be here) that now-former Iowa Dept of Economic Director Mike Tramontina discussed in a memo last Wednesday.
“Iowa Lawmaker Says Legislators Knew of Film Issues Early Summer”
- Dave Price “Price of Politics” 9/24/09

SEPT. 15: Gov. Chet Culver first hears of problems with the film tax credit, he says. He asks Tramontina for a summary by the end of the next day.
“Miller: Official's assertion on film credits 'mistaken'”
- Lee Rood Des Moines Register 9/25/09

Phil Roeder, spokesman for Culver, said Tramontina raised concerns about the purchase of the automobiles in August, but nobody brought up the depth of the program’s problems until September.
“Lawmaker said he had concerns about film tax credit program months ago”
- Charlotte Eby Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier 10/6/09

"It is critical that the Department of Economic Development immediately prevent additional spending for this program," Sen. Bill Dotzler, D-Waterloo, wrote to Mike Tramontina, the department's director, on Aug. 6. Dotzler send copies of his letter to the governor's office, state auditor and attorney general.
“Records show Culver's office was notified about film office trouble in August”
- Lee Rood Des Moines Register 11/7/2009

The question the Governor now needs to answer is what did he know and when did he know it? Governor Culver clearly stated that he did not learn of the problems at the Iowa Film Office until September 15th from former IDED Director Mike Tramontina. Yet both his spokesperson and the Governor himself stated that they knew of the irregularities in August. In fact the Governor went on to claim that he pushed for the audit put out for an RFP by Tramontina on the 10th of August. So Governor what did you know and when did you know it?

Restoring the Fiscal Balance: Iowa Family Budget Initiatives

2009-11-19T09:57:00.000-08:00

We have real solutions to help solve Iowa’s budget crisis and protect the very family budgets that will be at risk if bold action is not taken quickly.

Constitutional Limit on State Spending
We will propose and support an amendment to the Iowa Constitution to limit state spending to no more than 99% of state revenue. The current budget limitation law doesn’t work and, just last year, the legislature authorized nearly 70 loopholes in the current law to allow their outrageous spending increases.

Only an amendment to the Iowa Constitution is immune from legislative loopholes. Limiting spending to 99% of revenue ensures a balanced budget and the annual deposit of money into a rainy day fund. In the meantime, we pledge to pass NO budgets that exceed the 99% limit.

Iowa families must live within their means--Iowa state government should be no different.

Supermajority Vote to Approve New State Debt
This year the Governor signed and a majority of the legislature passed legislation that puts Iowa taxpayers on the hook for a $1.7 billion debt. The average Iowa family’s share of that debt is more than $2,000.

This debt was passed with support form only one party and was done despite statewide polling that showed 70% of Iowans opposed this additional debt. Iowans need greater protection from runaway state debt and these decisions should require more than a simple majority vote—especially when the repayment of the debt may extend for more than two decades and impact taxpayers too young to vote or not even yet born.

We propose requiring a 2/3 supermajority vote of both houses of the Legislature to authorize new state borrowing. Never again should one party have the sole authority to create these long-term debt burdens.

At the local level a 60% vote of the people is required to adopt new debt to ensure there is widespread community support for the projects to be funded. At the state level a 2/3 supermajority vote of the Legislature will help guarantee the same kind of broad support for similar state efforts.

We support pay-as-you-go budgets as the best method for funding state programs. However, if borrowing is occasionally necessary to meet critical needs, we want to ensure the support for that borrowing extends beyond the short term political objectives of any one party and meets the needs of a broad spectrum of Iowans. A 2/3 supermajority vote helps accomplish that goal.

Sunset Authorization of Every State Program
During these difficult economic times, every Iowa family has been forced to gather around their kitchen table and examine every aspect of their personal spending. They ask difficult questions and set new spending priorities to ensure their essential needs are met. Unfortunately, this same discussion rarely occurs within state government.

We propose a systematic process wherein EVERY program funded by state government will be sunset (de-authorized) by a date certain unless the Governor and Legislature reauthorize that program. This will force a thorough top-to-bottom review of every existing program funded by state government to determine whether the program is effectively and efficiently meeting the needs for which it was created, or if the need even continues to exist.

Those programs that are no longer relevant or functioning at a high level will be eliminated, reorganized, or the resources diverted to other priorities--just the way Iowa families eliminate spending that no longer meets their personal needs.

Incremental budgeting practices have led to a bloated and expensive state government that is both unsustainable and a drain on Iowa taxpayers. We will streamline state spending and state programs in a way that protects taxpayers from excessive state spending and ensures better delivery of state services to those in need.

A History of Fiscal Mismanagement

2009-10-07T07:10:00.000-07:00

In Their Own
Words …………….

… a deepening national recession dealt Iowa a serious financial blow that Culver said has left him with no choice but to make "significant cuts in government spending."
“Budget plan dismays some”
- Jennifer Jacobs and Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 1/29/09

The new revenue estimates mean the cuts must go deeper. "This is the worst I've ever seen. This is the worst in my 27 years in the Legislature," Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, said Friday during taping of Iowa Public Television's "Iowa Press."
“More cuts in state jobs, services seen”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 3/21/09

"If you look at how deep this recession was," Culver said, "I'm encouraged to see some of the trends showing improvement."
“Culver's advisers guardedly upbeat about economic turnaround”
- Jennifer Jacobs Des Moines Register 8/11/09

"In spite of the economic challenges brought on by the world-wide recession, and a projected shortfall for the fiscal year 2011 budget ….” Culver said in a statement.
“Culver dips $45 million from emergency reserves to balance budget”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 9/26/09

And Their Actions Led to ????????

Iowa legislators, intensely worried early this year about a looming recession and the economic toll of natural disasters, ended the 2009 session by approving the largest budget in the state's history - $6.3 billion.
“Federal stimulus plugs holes, but problems loom for future”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 4/27/09

That caps off a five-year spending uptick that, in total, increased by 25 percent from $5.02 billion in 2006.
“Federal stimulus plugs holes, but problems loom for future”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 4/27/09

The state's revenue would have to grow by almost 10 percent in the 2011 fiscal year for the state to avoid future gaps, the Legislative Services Agency estimated about a month ago.
“Federal stimulus plugs holes, but problems loom for future”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 4/27/09

That means the upcoming budget will be almost $6.3 billion, the largest in the state's history, according to the Legislative Services Agency.
“News Analysis: Session recaps often stretch facts”
- Jason Clayworth Des Moines Register 5/10/09

Iowa families cannot afford Governor Culver and Legislative Democrats Record of Fiscal Mismanagement!

Lights. Camera. Action - but not too much action.

2009-08-26T11:53:00.000-07:00

“If you build it, He will come.” The Iowa Legislature, in a bi-partisan fashion in 2007 and in 2009, passed film tax incentives to surpass what other states were offering to lure Hollywood into Iowa. Well, the film industry has arrived in Iowa - and it is big business for the state - bringing in film crews, movie stars and the best of Iowa jobs and opportunities. But wait…..like every good Hollywood movie, there is a plot twist ahead.

Dozens of film advocates and Iowans are now worried that a law change passed by Iowa Democrats capping the tax credits in the closing days of the 2009 session will effectively kill the tax breaks and this new Iowa industry.

Iowa Democrats are proud of their achievements and twittering away on how their insight brought economic development to Iowa. Well, that is nothing more than “Hollywood hype.” Congrats, to the promotions department. But, all the airbrushing and press releases can’t hide the fact that the Democrat’s compulsive spending habits have led to the dismantling of this field of dreams. So, they built it, they came, but the Democrat’s cancelled the game.

All the movie magic in the world can't cover this one up. Democrats are, yet again, trying to have it both ways. They need the economic dollars to balance out their flawed budget but don't want to give too many breaks/incentives. This is one tale that won't end well as Iowa's Hollywood dreams are quickly fading to black.

Click here to watch a video on an awesome opportunity Iowa has with the film industry, but thanks to the Democrats' tax caps, this could be the last pirate ship that sets sail here.

Wasteful Spending to Find Wasteful Spending

2009-08-25T12:24:00.000-07:00

The Culver administration continues down the path of fiscal irresponsibility as it was revealed today that they are definitely dumping a firm from Minnesota that they paid $6.35 million to help find ways to cut government spending in Iowa. They're opting to pay a new firm roughly $300,000 to do the same thing. What a bargain! I'm sure that is what Culver and his advisors are thinking. Too bad the state has already spent four years and millions paying the Minnesota firm to find all these ineffeciencies. So what happened to all the suggestions they made and why can't the state simply use their recommendations? The contract was initiated by the Vilsack administration and Culver thinks he can now do better. Obviously, they also didn't like the suggestions. Hopefully, this new firm will offer some suggestions that are liked by someone in the Governor's office so spending this wasteful spending to find more wasteful spending is caught and nipped in the bud. Wishful thinking, we know.....

Republicans have been making cost-saving, budget-cutting suggestions to the Democrats for months, but it's fallen on deaf ears. The House Republicans even established a web site gathering ideas from Iowans on how to cut costs. Those suggestions were free. Free is good.

Debt and Jobs

2009-07-24T08:40:00.000-07:00

The governor announced yesterday that the state would be receiving $100 million to repair roads and bridges. Iowa is getting this money thanks to the bonds that the state is selling. Remember: We've got a triple 'A' rating so lets sell 'em! This isn't free-and-clear money. It's debt that our children and grandchildren will have to pay back and I'm sure they won't be too happy about it once the are old enough to understand why their taxes are so high.

This money will be put towards the state's I-JOBS projects aimed at putting Iowans to work, but today, some people are questioning if that program will really help the state. One economist went so far as suggesting a better economic stimuls would be to lower taxes for businesses. We really like that idea and have some more like it but Democrats don't seem to want to listen. Guess they're enjoying spending your tax dollars and incurring debt too much to think about anything else.

There is still no clear answer as to how many jobs will be created from the I-JOBS program and whether those jobs will be quality jobs or temporary, minimum wage jobs. We're just hoping that those pesky pot holes will get filled before the snow falls.

Guest Column by Senator Randy Feenstra

2009-07-13T13:51:00.000-07:00

Democrats $56 Million Tax Hike is Politics as Usual

The Democrats eliminated major tax deductions and exemptions for Iowa flood and tornado victims in the 2009 legislative session. They also did away with the teachers tax deduction, college tuition assistance tax deduction, and the business depreciation tax deduction. These deductions put over $56 million back into the State General Fund.

The elimination of these deductions were never communicated to Iowa citizens or their accountants. The Democrats eliminated these deductions that have been available for years. The Democrats made the tax increases retroactive to the 2008 tax filings that were due April 15th. Iowans had no idea this tax increase was going to occur when they filed their 2008 return. Now the Department of Revenue has thousands of wrong tax returns and they are demanding payback for this tax money.

Since this tax hike was done under a cloak of secrecy due to political posturing under the claim of “we never raised taxes,” the Democrats find themselves in quandary.

To fix the problem, all Iowans who took these deductions must file an amended tax return or, hope they’re not audited which could result in a 5% tax penalty plus interest. The Iowa Department of Revenue has up to three years to identify these deduction errors and interest accrues until the money is paid. This becomes an expensive violation for something taxpayers did in good faith.

After Iowa taxpayers caught this political scheme, Governor Culver stated on Wednesday July 8th, that he would look at “any and all options” to address this snafu. The Vice Chair of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, Sen. Matt McCoy, noted the issue got knotted up with other tax proposals and stalled during the 2009 session.

Lets be crystal clear, this was done with no regard to Iowa taxpayers. I spoke on the floor of the Senate three times demanding that these deductions be passed for the flood victims, teachers, and businesses. I offered amendments to make sure these deductions were restored but got voted down by the Democrats. Every Democrat Senator knew the ramifications of not communicating this tax increase but they decided to play the political game of “We don’t think Iowa citizens are smart enough to catch this tax increase.”

It’s very disappointing when the Democrats call for government transparency but do things that contradict this very thought. Frankly, it seams the Democrats no longer care about Iowans; rather, for them it’s about winning elections at all costs. This is truly a failure in good government.

Senator Feenstra resides in Hull and sits on the Ways and Means, Education, Rebuild Iowa, and Appropriations Committees. He is also ranking member of the State Government Committee.

Having it Both Ways

2009-07-10T08:32:00.000-07:00

No surprise here, Governor Culver is asking the Iowa Department of Revenue to hold off on collecting tax refunds that were issued to flood victims. This comes after the realization that these victim's were taxed on the refunds thanks to Legislative Democrats and the Governor choosing not to couple the Iowa tax code with the federal tax code.

During the legislative session, Democrats had ample opportunity to couple the codes but they chose not to. Now, as the governor is publicly ramping up his re-election campaign, he wants to backtrack, safe face and not punish these flood victims. Too little too late if you ask us. With a $160 million revenue shortfall in the Iowa budget, Democrats need the taxes. We don't see this problem going away anytime soon.

Here's the TV story explaining the problem.

When is a pay freeze not a pay freeze?

2009-06-16T05:47:00.000-07:00

Only in state government can a freeze on salaries mean a 4.5% increase in pay. In February, of this year, the Governor agreed to give a $120 million pay increase to state employees. But wait, the headlines were screaming that a pay freeze was going into effect for the upcoming fiscal year.

While private employers and employees in Iowa are struggling to keep their doors open the Governor and legislative Democrats continue to spend and spend and spend.

Following the announcement the Governor’s team and his big labor buddies were crowing that this was a contract both sides could be proud of. It was also stated that this new contract reflected the current economic realities facing the nation. Well that $120 million dollar pay increase would go a long way to solving the nearly $1 billion budget gap the Governor and legislative Democrats have created by their reckless spending.

Well it turns out that in state government a freeze means a pay increase.

(The dirty details are below)

Union or Classification - Pay Increase
AFSCME - Central and Community Based Corrections (CBCs) - $39,789,422
Iowa United Professionals (IUP) - Social Services and Science - $8,877,590
State Police Officer's Council (SPOC) - $2,702,246
Judicial Public, Professional, and Maintenance Employees (PPME) - $229,660
Judicial AFSCME - $1,811,551
Judicial Exempt - $2,402,719
Non-Contract - $13,820,381
Board of Regents - $51,167,428

Total = $120,800,997

Here is the rest of the story

2009-06-12T08:37:00.000-07:00

Since the end of session there has been a lot of fluffy political rhetoric coming from the other side of the aisle. Words like reorganization, budgeting responsibly and accountability. Well as the late great Paul Harvey would say ………… And here is the rest of the story.

Over the past three years the Governor and his legislative allies have spent and spent and spent without any thoughts on what tomorrow was going to bring. Well tomorrow has come and there was no plan in place to deal with the problems that the state is now facing. In fact the nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency, the bean counters for the legislature, has estimated that Iowa is facing nearly a $1 billion deficit for next year.

Is this being accountable to the taxpayer or budgeting responsibly?

If you look at the last time Republicans were in control of the budget spending was held below the rate of inflation. Over the past three years spending has ballooned out of control and well past the rate of inflation. If the Democrats would have maintained spending levels at typical historical levels there would be no talk of a budget crisis.

Spending at the rate of inflation; now that would have been responsible budgeting.

Contradictions Galore

2009-06-10T08:37:00.000-07:00

There is a bake sale taking place at the Capitol today and a dessert auction with all proceeds going to the Iowa Food Bank. A worthy cause and decadent sweets and treats abound. There are so many treats, that if you think of the one thing your grandma made for you as a kid, it is probably being sold here today. The contradiction part is that all this baked goodness is on behalf/part of Lt. Governor Patty Judge's challenge: Your Heart is in Your Hands. Judge is challenging Iowans to live healthier lives by exorcising more, eating well and kicking bad habits. She says in an e-mail to all state employees, "as a former nurse -- I know that our health begins with each of us." So why is she promoting calloric overload in the form of Oreo Layer Cake?

This is from the Lt. Gov's challenge web site http://www.ltgovernorschallenge.us/:
The Lieutenant Governors' Challenge is a 12-week reward based program. Participants may choose to work toward heart health through fitness choices, health choices, or both.

Great, we should all try to live healthy lives and if you set out on a public challenge like this, you should stick to it, not help Iowans deviate from their wellness plan by promoting unhealthy sweets. We all love a good cookie, but is this event really appropriate for the promotion of health and well-being? We say, NO.

A Clear Message Sent

2009-05-28T08:59:00.000-07:00

Click here to read about how Iowa is hiring a Texas public releations firm to promote the state and bring in jobs. The article speaks for itself.

Flexing the Line-Item Veto Muscle

2009-05-27T11:18:00.000-07:00

It is unfortunate that the Governor sided with bureaucrats and business as usual instead of the taxpayers and transparency this week when he used his line item veto authority on the budget this year. He struck cost saving measures that would have provided at least some transparency. While the Governor struck cost saving measures he did sign into law the largest budget in Iowa's history that leaves the taxpayer staring at a $900 million hole for next year, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Service Agency. This is reality and unfortunately the Governor and his Democratic allies at the Capitol this year stuck their collective heads in the sand like an ostrich hoping good times will come again. This is not a show of leadership skills but simply more political rhetoric and grandstanding from a group of politicians that have been warned for three years that their explosive spending was going to drive this state into the red yet they failed to listen.

There is a spending problem in this state and the Governor and his Democratic allies need a lesson in frugality as the taxpayer cannot afford more of the same old tired political games. Reform is needed and Republicans are ready and willing to lead that charge for the taxpayer to help protect their money from those that want to spend it on pork barrel projects and over $120 million in salary increases for state employees. Lets hope that someday common sense will win out.

Spend it While You Got it

2009-05-19T12:11:00.000-07:00

Yesterday, State Auditor David Vaudt released his report on the growing revenue and spending problem the state is facing. Iowa will receive federal stimulus money that will, for one time only, helpt to alleviate the bleeding. But if Iowa continues at the current rate, in 2011, the budget will be 61% less than the previous year. That's huge!

Auditor Vaudt gave a good example: for every $1.00 brought into Iowa, the state spent $1.14. Doesn't seem like a lot, but boy does it add up. The bonding numbers are worse. For every $1.00 borrowed, Iowa will end up spending $2.18 to pay it back. How is this fiscal responsibility?

Here's the clincher - if spending would have been kept in line with inflation, Iowa would have had a 2% surplus this year! People need to speak up. Iowans will unfortunately feel the ramifications of this in their higher taxes and raised fees next year.

Swine Flu

2009-05-06T10:22:00.000-07:00

The new, deadly virus has hit Iowa and hit it hard. Not only are there reported cases of the H1N1 virus throughout the state, today, China stated they would no longer accept Iowa pork exports. That is devastating news.

Iowa Secretary of Agriculture, Bill Northey, released this statement: “Iowa pork, and all pork for that matter, is safe and China and the other countries that are banning pork imports are not acting based on science. It is unfortunate that these unjustified actions are being felt most dramatically by the farmers who raise pork. The industry has already been facing very difficult economics for the last several months, and this just adds to the difficulties experienced by Iowa’s pork producers.”

Why are we not hearing more state officials speak out on this? This has a huge affect on Iowa's economy and we can't do enough to correct misconceptions about the virus and Iowa pork.

Iowa Senate Republicans

2009-04-29T13:16:00.000-07:00

The Fall of the Gavel

2009-04-26T03:42:00.000-07:00

It is 5:42 a.m. on Sunday morning at the State Capitol and the end is here. The final bill of the session is on the Senate floor, the budget is balanced, Iowa has bonded and borrowed so much money that it is insane. The standings bill (pork barrel spending bill) passed and everyone is tired and cranky. Let's do it again next year!!

Down Time

2009-04-23T17:37:00.000-07:00

There is a lot of down time today. Most everyone in the Senate has been at the Capitol for roughly 11 hours and seen only 2 minutes of actual bill work take place. The bills that will hopefully be dispensed with very soon are the Health and Human Services budget bill, a health care bill coming back from the House and a bill regarding flood insurance.

Earlier this week Democrats passed a bill appropriating money to 13 state agencies. Amendments were tacked onto the bill that gave the OK for the state to purchase brand new vehicles – even though perfectly good newer vehicles are sitting, gathering dust in parking lots. These new vehicles will have all sorts of upgrades thanks to this amendment. Some of those upgrades include leather seats, satellite radio, GPS, running boards, truck toppers and new floor mats. Pretty nice considering the state is so cash strapped lately. It’s nice to see that tax dollars are being put to good use.............

***Update***
On a positive note, the new Adam Walsh bill just passed in the Senate tonight. The bill is tougher than the old sex offender law and provides for a 2000 plus foot rule. This was a truly bipartisan bill that will help protect Iowa children. The bill is now on to the House.

The Long Haul Part 2

2009-04-21T12:16:00.000-07:00

It is safe to say that everyone at the Capitol is getting a little stir crazy. Legislators would be the first to admit that. The weather is nice, the steady stream of bills has become a trickle and after being cooped up in the Capitol with the same people all winter, tempers flare. That is still no excuse to not take care of the important business of Iowa.

Democrats don't seem to care as they have dug their heels into the ground and closed the lines of communication. Today Democrats in the House and Senate admitted that they are not communicating with the Governor on the most important issue in Iowa - the budget. Until that happens, everyone else is left wondering why egos can't be put in check to get to work. Pouting like high schoolers is sooooo last year..........

In it for the Long Haul

2009-04-20T15:37:00.000-07:00

And that long haul could last longer than originally anticipated. It will all depend on how the Democrats decide to work together on the whole bonding thing. Will it be the Governor's $750 million I-JOBS version or the Senate's $125 million version? It's all up in the air right now and Republicans are just waiting for the dust to settle.

Click here for more details.

A Summary of This Week

2009-04-16T12:41:00.000-07:00

This is the weekly Republican press conference and it is a good summary of what's been going on at the Capitol this week.

Iowa Tea Party

2009-04-15T11:21:00.000-07:00

The Business of the People

2009-04-14T15:01:00.000-07:00

Iowans for Tax Relief once again rallied the troops today and had supporters of federal deductibility show up at the Capitol. No movement on the issue on the Senate side today so we're wondering if it will even be brought up. It doesn't look like the votes are there to pass it.

A bill that did pass today grants tax credits for movie stars and movie makers who make films or TV shows in Iowa. It's a great economic incentive to bring that type of business to the state, but not long ago, the Senate failed to pass tax credits for teachers who buy classroom supplies for their students. Something about that doesn't seem quite right.

The Senate also voted on a Governor appointed nominee (Sharon Elderkin) to the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission. The nominee didn't get enough votes to pass. Just so you know, the nominee is a registered Republican. Republicans voted against her due to her lack of knowledge on important commission matters. This is a truly important commission in the state and not being able to understand things like particulate matter and how run-off occurs is a deal breaker.

Let the Countdown Begin

2009-04-13T12:38:00.000-07:00

Word around the Capitol is that this is the last week of the 2009 Legislative session. Realistically, it won't happen this week. There are just too many bills to get through. Today debate is taking place on drainage districts, fee increases for nursing homes and creating new community programs in Iowa that have a 'green' affect. The Senate is waiting to get bills from the House, including any bills that are bounce backs having first passed the Senate, then gone to the House are are back in the Senate. The Governor's bonding bill hasn't been seen either. So much for the Democrat's April 2nd deadline.

Spend Now, Pay Later

2009-04-09T11:19:00.000-07:00

As we’re in the last days of the 2009 legislative session, Democrats in the Iowa Senate continued their tax and spend practices yesterday by approving another bonding plan and voting against relieving Iowans’ tax burden.

The first bill that passed yesterday allows the University of Iowa to bond for $100 million in an effort to rebuild art museum facilities that were damaged by last summer’s floods. The debt incurred for this bonding plan would more than double at a total of $216.9 million over it’s lifespan, ending in 2040.

Democrats also voted against an amendment that would lessen the tax burden many Iowans face by allowing coupling to be an option in filing state taxes. Iowa tax code is updated yearly based upon the federal tax code. Allowing Iowans to couple their taxes lessens their tax burden.

These out of control spending practices will burden our children and grandchildren and creates a ripple effect of problems for our future.

Most recently, news on the federal deductibility issue is that Democrats have come together to work out a new plan, but don’t be fooled by the spin on this issue. Eliminating federal deductibility is still a tax on a tax for most Iowans. We're expecting debate on the issue next week.

Nothing is Ever Dead at the Capitol

2009-04-07T12:14:00.000-07:00

A common saying around the Capitol is that nothing is ever dead here. SO very true as the elimination of federal deductibility seems to be rearing it's ugly head this week. http://tinyurl.com/cy77fv. It looks like Democrats have agreed on a tax plan. That means Iowa taxes are set for a $190 million increase in 2 years.

It is not to late call your State Rep and State Senator http://tinyurl.com/27mzfv. Let them know what you think about the issue.

Release on Marriage Amendment From Today

2009-04-06T15:47:00.000-07:00

Senator Mike Gronstal Obstructs Vote of the
People of Iowa on Marriage Amendment
Sen. McKinley: “We have had the Legislature and the governor decide in favor of traditional marriage and we have now had seven judges in black robes decide the opposite way and I believe the final arbiters of this important decision should be the people of Iowa”

DES MOINES, IA – Senate Republican Leader Paul McKinley (R-Chariton) today formally asked Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal (D-Council Bluffs) on the floor of the Iowa Senate why he is obstructing a vote of the people of Iowa on an amendment to the Iowa Constitution that would define marriage as between one man and one woman.

When Iowa’s Defense of Marriage Act overwhelmingly passed the Iowa Senate in 1998, Senator Gronstal voted in support of traditional marriage. Today, he is the only person in the Iowa Senate standing in the way of allowing three million people a chance to have their vote.

“We have had the Legislature and the governor decide in favor of traditional marriage and we have now had seven judges in black robes come down in another way and I believe the final arbiters of this important issue should be the people of Iowa,” said McKinley. “Iowa is a sovereign state and I will accept the will of the people but we will not know the will of the people until a vote of the people is taken and it is wrong for Sen. Gronstal to obstruct that vote.”

McKinley said he believes that if Senate Majority Leader Gronstal were to allow a vote in the Iowa Senate, there would be 26 votes to pass it and therefore start the process of amending Iowa’s Constitution.

You may contact Senator Gronstal at mike.gronstal@legis.state.ia.us or by phone at 515-281-4610.

###

Recent Events

2009-04-03T12:06:00.000-07:00

Today, the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously upheld a lower courts ruling recognizing gay marriage in the state.

Here is Senate Republican Leader Paul McKinley's statement regarding the Iowa Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage:

“The decision made by the Iowa Supreme Court today to allow gay marriage in Iowa is disappointing on many levels. I believe marriage should only be between one man and one woman and I am confident the majority of Iowans want traditional marriage to be legally recognized in this state. Though the court has made their decision, I believe every Iowan should have a voice on this matter and that is why the Iowa Legislature should immediately act to pass a Constitutional Amendment that protects traditional marriage, keeps it as a sacred bond only between one man and one woman and gives every Iowan a chance to have their say through a vote of the people.”

On another note.............

Here is Senator Randy Feenstra (Hull) expressing his disgust over the coupling bill and the Senate's spending practices:

Taxpayers Kicked Out of Capitol

2009-04-01T12:26:00.000-07:00

Last night's House of Representatives public hearing on possibly eliminating federal deductibility was a great show in solidarity for the Iowa taxpayer. We're estimating that roughly 600 people showed up and apparently things got animated. We're not talking slanderous outbursts, but the occasional applause and some 'boos' were heard after speakers stated their views. Well, it was enough for the House Speaker to get upset, flex his political power muscle and kick everyone out of the House Gallery. After state troopers forced the audience to leave the hearing went on and all scheduled speakers were able to talk.

But c'mon, House Democrats can't handle a little applause from an animated crowd? I'm sure they hear much worse at their political forums - at least that's what we guess from the pile of bad bills they bring up over there. Last night's public hearing wasn't legislative procedure. It was public and open - there's no specific decorum for that so the fact that everyone was unnecessarily kicked out of the House Gallery really stings. I'm sure taxpayers will get their revenge on election day.

Here's what Senator David Johnson had to say about it this morning:

Crowd Takes Over Capitol

2009-03-31T17:32:00.000-07:00

At 6:30 p.m. Tuesday night, a HUGE crowd showed up for the House public hearing on the possible elimination of federal deductibility. It was great. Everyone got these great red shirts that read, "No tax on a tax." Seeing the sea of red in the House gallery was great. Check out the video we shot below. We're hoping all these united voices will make an impact on the Democrats who want to eliminate federal deductibiliy.

Eliminating Federal Deductibility Rolling Through Capitol

2009-03-31T11:19:00.000-07:00

This issue is really heating up the Capitol today. Here is audio from Senator Brad Zaun, Senator Randy Feenstra and Senator David Johnson all commenting on the Senate florr how the elimination of federal deductibility will result in a tax on a tax and hurt small businesses in Iowa.

Don't forget: PUBLIC HEARING: Tonight
The Iowa House is holding a public hearing on the bill to repeal federal deductibility in Iowa.
Who, when and where: Anyone wanting to speak out against eliminating federal deductibility meet at 6:30pm at the State Capitol cafeteria. The public hearing on federal deductibility will be from 7:30pm-9:30pm in the House.

Get Back to the Real Issues

2009-03-30T14:25:00.000-07:00

This weekend, the big news was about a certain Senator using a racial slur. It was the big buzz Monday at the Capitol. And all we'll say on the matter is if this was a Republican they would've been burned at the stake. Unfortunatley, this detracted from the real issues facing Iowans: raising taxes and the state budget.

We can already tell you that the state budget will not be seen for at least a few more days. Democrats have posted their number but there is still too much to iron out.

Raising taxes will take center stage tomorrow as the House holds public hearings at 7:30 p.m. on federal deductibility and it's possible elimination. The bill is starting in the House. If nothing else sticks with you today remember this: elemination of federal deductibility results in a tax on a tax.

Hopefully there will be a great turnout and strong opposition to the issue will send a clear message to the House.

Seen Around the Capitol This Week

2009-03-27T13:21:00.000-07:00

Senators Reynolds, Behn, Noble go over legislation.

Senator Bartz talks to Lake Mills High students

Taxing a Tax

2009-03-26T15:32:00.001-07:00

Democrats have made it official: They are looking to eliminate federal deductibility. They rolled out what they are calling a middle class tax cut, but lets call a spade a spade. Eliminating federal deductibility is a tax on a tax.

If you don't have kids or own a house, you're really screwed. Some Iowans use federal deductibility to lessen their tax burden and Iowa is one of a few states that still does that.

The Democrats are going to say that this is a revenue neutral thing to do, but what happens next year when they don't have the federal stimulus money to plug the gaping deficit hole and they need to up the ante and increase the tax burden even more? We're just sayin' - it's a pretty real possibility.

After the Democrats pass their “tax cut” - which really totals about 17 cents - Iowa families could purchase a gallon of milk and loaf of bread after only 28 days of saving.

$3.31 for a gallon of milk
$1.40 for a loaf of bread
$.17 per day tax cut by the Democrats……..priceless

* U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Say Goodbye to Federal Deductibility

2009-03-25T11:30:00.000-07:00

Senate Democratic Leadership is making a bold move by recently announcing that they will attempt to eliminate federal deductibility. The message signals that Iowans should brace themselves for a tax increase. Based on the most recent information, eliminating federal deductibility would be a tax increase of $594 million. An Iowa household earning $45,000 would receive an average of a 5% increase in their taxes or $222.

Iowa is one of a handful of states that allows a 100% deduction for federal income tax payments on the state individual tax return. It protects Iowans from paying a state income tax on money used to pay their federal income tax. It is the largest way some Iowans may lessen their tax burden.

Democrats have tried to disguise the potential change by claiming it is tax simplification and it makes the system fairer. It looks like the Democrats’ definition of simplification is different from the taxpayer’s definition since this elimination actually raises taxes.

Proponents of the elimination of federal deductibility claim the deduction allows “wealthy” Iowans to avoid paying their “fair share” of Iowa personal income taxes. This data shows that the top income earners in the state are already paying a significant share of the total Iowa personal income tax burden. In fact, the top 10% of Iowa taxpayers pay about 40% of all Iowa personal income taxes. The next 20% pay about 30% of the burden, the next 20% pay less than 20%, and the bottom 50% of all Iowa income taxpayers pay less than 10% of the total Iowa personal income taxes.

Proponents have also argued that if Democrats eliminated federal deductibility and then lowered the tax rates it would make the state more attractive to persons looking to relocate themselves and along with their business in Iowa. This argument is a bit of a stretch. It’s hard to believe that an someone looking to relocate is only going to base their decision on the tax rates on their tax return. There are so many other factors that influence business including effective tax rates, business environment, accessibility to transportation, and quality of life - to name a few.

We’re still waiting for legislation to be introduced. And with Democrats looking for a way to pay for more of their state spending, the elimination of federal deductibility could be their ticket to get back in the black. When talk turns to eliminating federal deductibility and promises to reduce tax rates, Iowans should understand it is simply a shell game and they should get ready to pay more.

Guest Column by Senate Republican Whip Steve Kettering (Lake View)

2009-03-24T14:21:00.000-07:00

When your act is not quite ready for Broadway, you see how it plays in Peoria. This week the Governor took his Bonding Play to stages around the state.

The lights dim, the curtains part. The Governor rushes on stage. The set is the Capitol rotunda. The Governor is dressed in Sunday’s best. The temperature is warm. He is sweating as he excitedly runs across stage, his right hand held high above his head, a credit card in hand. “I’ve got a higher limit, we can spend more he says to those assembled. We don’t have to accept that Senate baby bond bill of only $175 million. It is not enough. We can do more. The state’s credit rating is triple A. We can borrow $750 million. It won’t affect our credit rating. Other states have borrowed far more. We can spend it now. Gaming taxes will pay for this for 20 years to come. You see how easy it is? It is the gamblers who will pay,” he says. The Governor’s stay on stage is brief. There is more shopping to do. The credit card has not been maxed out. The Governor’s exiting line: “Today is the time to spend.” With that he moves off stage.

The reviews were not pleasant. The critics not kind. The obvious – this bonding play is not destined for Broadway. It may be rescripted. Total scenes may be removed. Legislative democrats immediately rejected borrowing for transportation infrastructure, and rolled out their own $700 million borrowing plan. Iowans will see many versions of spending plans before adjournment. What is disappointingly missing is any attempt to prioritize spending within revenues received. It is apparent this administration is determined to live far beyond it’s means.

As I write this, the Senate is concluding debate on Senate File 389. This bill removes individual responsibility and replaces it with government run health care. The private insurance companies of this state will be required to subsidize a state bureaucratic corporation. It will require private citizens to disclose on income tax returns the status of their children’s health coverage. The bill mandates the Department of Revenue and Department of Human Services to create penalties for parents who do not sign their children up for government issued health insurance. This bill passed the Senate 30 – 18 with bipartisan opposition and will now go to the House.

Sitting Idly By....

2009-03-23T14:19:00.000-07:00

There's been a lot of talk lately about budget cuts and how to get the state back in the black for FY 2009. Well, we have one suggestion: stop buying new state vehicles. The ones we have are clearly are not used.

We caught rows of idle state vehicles in a parking ramp with layers of dust on them. It's obvious they haven't been driven in quite a while.

So while the Democrats complain and complain that it is the national economy they ignore what they can do to take care of the budget mess they created. Republicans offered an amendment that would have suspended the purchasing of new vehicles for the remainder of FY 09 and all of FY 10. Instead of accepting this common sense amendment that would have saved over $10 million they rejected it. Instead of using the vehicle in this photo and many more just like it the Democrats would rather use your tax dollars to prop up Ford and General Motors.

Finally, we'll say it again: Democrats don't have a deficit problem, they have a spending problem and this parking ramp is proof.

The Numbers are Out

2009-03-20T13:02:00.000-07:00

A big, fat OUCH. The Revenue Estimating Conference met today to project the budget for the remained of 2009 and into 2010. It isn't pretty. The new estimate for 2009 is a decrease of $158 million in total net receipts as compared to actual FY 2008. For 2010: The new estimate is a decrease of $164.4 million in total net receipts as compared to estimated FY 2009.

Contrary to what you might be hearing - Iowa does not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. Added state programs, full time employees to go with those programs, money to repair historic pipe organs, and satellite radio in state vehicles adds up. Where will it stop?

Hello! What have we been saying the last two years? Spending at an unsustainable level has put Iowa in the red. Be prepared, my friends, bad things are on the horizon.

Here is a great suggestion for the spending practices going on in the state:

Healthcare Dictatorship

2009-03-19T17:28:00.000-07:00

This afternoon a bill requiring Iowans to have health insurance passed with bipartisan opposition in the Iowa Senate.

The bill requires Iowans, whose income is at or below the 300% level of the Federal Poverty Level - or just over $60,000 - to enroll their children in a state-run health insurance plan. If Iowans do not enroll in a form of health insurance, residents will face penalties created by the Department of Human Services and Department of Revenue. We don't yet know what those penalties will be but it is likely to be monetary. So what the Democrats proposed is penalizing the poorest of our population? Many would say these people already have enough hardships without the insurance police coming after them.

The bill creates more bureaucracy by having an insurance board that is legally untouchable. They can make decisions on these insurance cases in this new program but appealing those decisions will be virtually impossible.

Anytime an uninsured child goes into a hospital for care, they are never turned away. Iowa has Hawk-I provided for kids for free or at a reduced rate. These programs have worked perfectly in the past. In fact, if you turn on your car radio on any given day, you'll hear a Hawk-I commercial. The state has been promoting the heck out of this program.

This bill is another step toward socialized medicine that will end up raising insurance rate with private insurers. All of Iowa will feel the pain of this bill.

Name That Bill!

2009-03-17T14:32:00.000-07:00

Last week was what is called Funnel Week. Although the atmosphere does at times resemble a circus, it does not have anything to do with funnel cakes. Like a diet, it is self-imposed. Funnel Week is a deadline for pushing bills out of committees onto the legislative calendar. Typically, if a bill doesn’t make it out of committee, it is considered dead. Below is a description of bills that we’ve been talking about on this blog that amazingly made it past Funnel Week. See if you can name that bill. Good luck! The answers are at the bottom of the page.

1. Allowing union workers to live long and prosper without being burdened by management:

2. Finding the most favorable doctor to write you a note to get you out of PE class:

3. Ensuring no worker is left behind in the pay line:

4. Making sure Miss Daisy does not pollute the air and taxing you more:

5. Eventually turning over the entire road to people on banana seats and bells:

6. Making sure everyone and their dog is safe if it rains:

7. The only piece of Iowa legislation to be discussed on the Tonight Show:

8. Making sure Grandma never sends you more than $5 so your "big brother" can get more money:

9. Copy of the U.S. Constitution: $5. Slapping U.S. history in the face: Priceless. For everything else, there’s bonding.

1. Collective Bargaining
2. Dr. Shopping
3. Prevailing Wage
4. Monitoring Car Emissions
5. Bicyclists Bill of Rights
6. Flood Insurance
7. DOA or the name change of the Dept. of Elder Affairs
8. Granny Tax
9. Popular Vote

5000 Jobs? Really?

2009-03-16T13:02:00.000-07:00

Today, Senator Jerry Behn of Boone gave his thoughts on the Senate floor about the claim that Democrats will get 5000 jobs out of their latest $175,000,000 bonding bill.

Governor Releases Details of Bonding Plan

2009-03-13T10:54:00.000-07:00

Yesterday, Governor Culver announced his plans for a new program he's calling I-jobs. He wants the state to bond for $750 million and says that will create 30,000 jobs in Iowa through the projects it goes toward. Just doing the simple math, that $750 million would be eaten up by paying the salaries of those 30,000 jobs. It breaks down to $25,000 per person salary. That's before anything even goes toward the actual projects.

The other night, the Senate debated a bonding bill. It passed along party lines and was for $175 million for 20 years. Here's a poignant quote from that debate spoken by the Senate Majority Leader to all Senate Republicans:

“As our unemployment rate climbs in the state of Iowa, your ‘no’ vote tonight is a ‘no’ to 5,000 jobs in this state. I can’t believe Republicans are ‘no’ to jobs, ‘no’ to veterans and ‘no’ to being tough on crime. Unbelievable." - Sen. Michael Gronstal D-Council Bluffs.

Since we keep our calculator handy, we broke down those 5000 jobs from this bonding bill to equal salaries of $35,000 - again, not even touching the projects themselves. Seeing 5000 jobs come to Iowa would be great, but is it realistic? Maybe, maybe not. (And since when is anybody pro-crime?)

And should the state bond simply because it can? Bond now and let our kids and grandkids pay for it later? Passing the buck will get us nowhere.

Seen around the Capitol this week:

Senator Johnson talks to UNI research students

Senator Tim Kapucian talks to regional 4-H clubs.

Panora Middle School students and Senator Nancy Boettger

Quote of the Day

2009-03-11T14:29:00.000-07:00

"This (raising student achievement) is not relevant to the issue at hand- we're just talking about the process for paying teachers."- Becky Schmitz (D- Fairfield), Chair of the Senate Education Committee in regards to a question posed by Senator Paul McKinley (R- Chariton) about how SF 314, legislation dealing with teacher pay, would help raise student achievement in Iowa.

Retirees and Your Community

2009-03-10T14:21:00.000-07:00

Yesterday, Senate File 291 passed and is on it’s way to the House. The bill calls for the Department of Elder Affairs to create a "certified retirement community" program that would encourage retirees to make their home in Iowa. The program is also supposed to aid in rural economic development. There are no costs associated with the bill unless a community pays for the certification.

Yesterday this was our quote of the day and it is worth repeating: “If a community can attract a retired person, that is the equivalent of attracting three-and-a-half manufacturing jobs to that community.” Senator Daryl Beall, D-Fort Dodge. Since when do retired citizens equate to any manufacturing jobs? Retirees don’t work – that’s what retirement is!

The buzz lately has been creating an environment conducive to job creation in any Iowa community. Sounds great, everyone wants to work right about now and wants thriving businesses in their communities. With the Iowa House talking about debating Dr. Shopping, Prevailing Wage and repealing Right to Work, maybe we should focus on those bills and making sure they die since they’ll all squelch that job creation environment.

We’ve been hearing some strong opinions from our loyal cyber fans about this bill and how ridiculous it is. To be fair, the bill passed unanimously, but it is a Democrat-sponsored bill that, in the Democrat-controlled Iowa Senate, is viewed as economic development. This is a real stretch and nowhere in the bill does it say anything about getting people to work by creating an atmosphere that would encourage job growth. But hey, if your city hall needs another piece of paper to put on the wall they can get it.

Things Are Starting to Happen

2009-03-09T15:19:00.000-07:00

A lot of different things are buzzing around Iowa right now. It started Friday with Governor Culver announcing that he would veto any gas tax that came to his desk and it's continuing as Matt Strawn, Iowa GOP Chairman, travels the state talking about all the bad bills circulating in the statehouse right now. And major props to Strawn because the DM Register wrote a positive article about how Iowa Republicans are moving up in the world thanks to the use of technology.

Around the Capitol today:

Senator Johnson with UNI students during Research Day.

And quote of the day: “If a community can attract a retired person, that is the equivalent of attracting three-and-a-half manufacturing jobs to that community.” Senator Daryl Beall, D-Fort Dodge, after a Senate bill passed unanimously to make communities "certified retirement communities" if they apply for that designation.

Guest Column by Senate Republican Whip Steve Kettering (Lake View)

2009-03-06T10:19:00.000-08:00

Confessions of a Shopaholic is a play that normally you would find on stage or screen at a downtown Des Moines venue. This week the troupe opened at the Capitol. The legislative version is - How much of your money do we need to spend? Initial calculations total at least $10.6 billion. The main players include a federal stimulus package of $2.1 billion, disaster relief of $1.5 billion, the Governor’s bonding proposal of $700 million, and state tax revenues of $6.1 billion. However, on stage first is a $175 million remake of a 2009 bond offering that attracted no buyers.

Our story begins there. You may recall that the 2008 Legislative Session ended with spending up nearly one billion dollars over a two year period. While the shopping was nearly complete, some items remained. The problem was lack of cash for the budget, so a tobacco bond was proposed. The state could simply borrow the money; spend now and pay later. But, no bond buyers showed up with cash for the state in exchange for those tobacco bonds.

Now a budget crisis looms. The state has more shopping to do, but where to find the money? Swinging on stage from high above stage left is the State Treasurer recommending an annual appropriation bond instead of a tobacco revenue bond. “You don’t even have to have a source of repayment,” he shouts. Spend now and future legislatures can simply appropriate every year for 20 years - enough to pay back what is spent this year. It is a simple and easy procedure. Pain free! Not to worry, the anticipated bond rating should be no more than one notch below the usual usurer rating. There may not even be a debt service reserve fund required. Spend away. This appropriation bond can be paid from any future source of revenue. Just let the next 20 legislatures worry about the repayment. A great idea. For 2009 we can cruise easy and trouble free; with that the Treasurer exits – stage left.

This annual appropriation bond moved out of the Senate Appropriations Committee this week. It will be debated on the floor in the near future. On the floor this week was also the 2009 appropriation adjustment bill. This formally deals with the changes the Governor has articulated in the past several months. Thus ends Act I.

An important budget date in the near future is March 20th. That is the scheduled date of the next Revenue Estimating Committee meeting. The projections announced at the conclusion of that meeting will have far reaching implications. They could render the Governor’s budget proposal and the recently announced Democrat targets meaningless.

Power Plant Goes Down Before it's Even Built

2009-03-05T14:58:00.000-08:00

Today it was announced that Alliant Energy will not move forward with their plans to build a $1.8 billion coal plant in Marshalltown. The Iowa Utilities Board set too much red tape around the facility being built.

Iowa currently receives 76% of it’s power from coal plants and because of that, rates in the state are some of the lowest in the nation. Those in support of the Marshalltown power plant have argued that another coal-fired plant is needed in order to bring more accessible power to the state. A larger power base will be more attractive to businesses as they explore moving to Iowa. And at a time when everyone seems to be talking about bringing jobs to the state, the IUB and with no help from the Governor, this plant plan has died.

We all know that Microsoft has put their plans on coming to Iowa on hold. Businesses like Microsoft really need lots of power to run. What's next? This is a huge blow to the state. And for everyone who is concerned about greenhouse gas emissions, look up the facts about coal. It is cleaner than ever. Emissions would be at a minimum.

It's really too bad that Iowa won't see the 1000 jobs that go with that plant and hopefully rates won't go up for customers.

You can read more details here:
http://tinyurl.com/ddoqf7

SRC Unveils Job Creation Initiative

2009-03-04T14:26:00.000-08:00

Today, Senate Republicans announced a three-point plan to give Iowa's economy a shot in the arm.

The Grow Iowa Not Government plan wouldn't cost a thing, wouldn't create more beauracracy and at the least would create jobs and get people talking about enhancing the state. It's a no-nonsense plan. Here are the details:

http://tinyurl.com/cjuwjz

Still Waiting

2009-03-03T12:52:00.000-08:00

The budget is one of the most contentious pieces of legislation that must be passed every year. It is the very last bill that has to be agreed upon for the Legislature to gavel out for the year and conclude session. As the majority party, the Democrats set the tone and budget numbers that are debated. Recently they released their first round of numbers for what they’d like the budget to look like. So far, their numbers still look like a hot mess and they only have themselves to thank for it.

We still don’t have the entire picture and most likely won’t for a while. The Revenue Estimating Conference meets on March 20 so target numbers will have to be re-estimated based on what comes out of that meeting.

For now, let’s attempt to break down the info that we do have and that is: over the last two years the Democrats have grown the General Fund by nearly $1 billion. That money has gone to programs and to fund things like the restoration of a pipe organ in Clermont. Growing government breeds dependency so in lean years funding these programs becomes pretty tough. When across-the-board cuts are made it doesn’t really look so deep – but the propped-up programs need to follow through on their promised dollars. (Say hello to higher taxes, Iowa, and good bye to Federal Deductibility) Just think where the state would be if spending had never been raised. We probably wouldn’t even need cuts.

Where’s the fiscal leadership? Waiting……..Waiting………..Waiting…………………

Bills Debated Today

2009-03-02T12:45:00.000-08:00

The Senate calendar is starting to get a little full and if the Democrats truly want to be outta here by April 2 the Legislature better get moving. So far, though, nothing too controversial has come up for debate. Since we are now eight weeks into the 2009 Legislative Session we’re predicting some late nights in the very near future. Here’s a run-down of bills the Senate will debate today:
SF 237 http://tinyurl.com/bxv44g

SF 207 http://tinyurl.com/cnhn6h

SF 203 http://tinyurl.com/b8qp8k

SF 199 http://tinyurl.com/carvc6

SF 176 http://tinyurl.com/cjfeeo

They all passed.

Around the Capitol This Week

2009-02-27T11:25:00.001-08:00

Senator Tim Kapucian with Center Point Urbana High School FCCLA students.

Senator Kim Reynolds visits with Americorps volunteers.

Senate Page Mia Kornelis and Senator Randy Feenstra.

Republican Leader Paul McKinley with Dr. Gary Runyon of Corydon.

Bicyclists in Rearview Mirror May be Going Faster Than They Appear

2009-02-26T15:34:00.000-08:00

Today one issue took up the majority of the day in the Senate: Bill #117 or the Bicylists Bill. We are all about sharing the road for our recreation-loving bike friends but the bill is a bit much. It offers cyclists extra protection from motor vehicle operators but Senate Republicans argued today that the protection offered puts drivers at a disadvantage and in some cases doesn't go far enough.

Senate Republicans offered nine amendments to truly improve the bills but all failed. Among the amendments:
-Requiring cyclists to attach flags to their bikes so drivers and farm machinery operators can see them.
-Exempting municipalities from being held liable from cycling accidents. (anyone remember what happened with RAGBRAI and Crawford County?)
-Changing the cycling hand signals so they are easier to decipher.

The overall bill gives cyclists five feet surrounding them at all times (even if they ride three wide) so passing them on county roads might become pretty trecherous. And watch out if you're driving farm equipment and meet one coming over a hill. Motorists must now sound their horn if they think a bike is near and they want to turn a corner. Drivers must also not open their car doors into oncoming traffic if they think cyclists are near "unless it is reasonably safe."

This bill just happened to deter everyone today as the Democrats finally released their budget numbers for the year. This distraction won't last long as those budget numbers will be seen for what they really are: a fiscal fiasco that could have been avoided over the last two years.

Allowable Growth Passes in Senate at 2%

2009-02-25T15:30:00.000-08:00

On Tuesday, February 24, the Iowa Senate passed SF 218, most commonly referred to as allowable growth, with 32 Democrats in favor of the bill and 18 Republicans opposed. The bill sets the allowable growth rate for the 2011-2012 school year at 2 percent.

During a budget year when all areas of government are being asked to cut spending, this bill will essentially allow Iowa’s K-12 public school districts to increase their budgets by 2 percent for fiscal year 2011. Under 2 percent “allowable growth,” per-pupil funding will increase by $115 to $5883.

School funding is based on a combination of state aid and property taxes. Two percent allowable growth will provide almost $3.7 billion in total funding for schools. Of that amount, roughly $2.4 billion will come from the state, and $1.3 billion will come from local property taxes. As families are being forced to re-examine their personal budgets and tighten their belts, this bill will increase property taxes by nearly $60 million compared to the amount established for the 2010-2011 school year. While there is never a good time to increase taxes, it is abundantly clear that now is an especially bad time.

Additionally, it is still unclear how the state will pay for a 4 percent increase in funding for schools next year, let alone another increase two years from now. The Governor has even recommended that funding be cut from next year’s K-12 budget, thereby placing the burden of his party’s excessive spending habits on local school districts and taxpayers to fill the inevitable gap. It is irresponsible to allocate additional dollars for fiscal year 2011 when we have not yet fixed the current fiscal year nor begun serious work on next year’s budget shortfall.

It was excessive spending on the part of the majority party that got our state into this financial crisis in the first place. Rather than possibly forcing schools to decide between making deep cuts to their budgets or raising taxes, the responsible approach would be to require schools to maintain a status quo budget for now, as it is always easier to appropriate additional dollars in the future if it is economically viable to do so.

Had the governor and legislative Democrats not spent nearly a billion dollars during the last two years and driven up hundreds of millions of dollars in self-inflicted deficits, it would be more feasible to permit additional allowable growth. Had the governor and legislative Democrats done a better job controlling spending and keeping government within its means, there would be more money available for top priorities like education.

Popular Vote Bill Gets a # (SF 227)

2009-02-24T16:56:00.000-08:00

Read the bill's details here: http://tinyurl.com/c2wa7t

Bill Disenfranchises Iowa Voters

2009-02-23T14:45:00.000-08:00

A bill was just pushed out of the Senate State Government Committee that would, if passed, essentially silence millions of Iowa voters’ voices. Senate Study Bill 1128 is more commonly referred to as the Popular Vote Bill and it guarantees the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most votes in all 50 states. It would turn all of Iowa’s Electoral College votes into popular votes automatically. Iowa's votes would turn into East Coast votes.

The fact that this idea is even being entertained is ridiculous. Iowa has worked hard to be the first in the nation caucuses and retain our independent voting spirit. This bill would throw it all out the window. Candidates would spend less time, money and effort on Iowa making the Iowa Caucuses irrelevant. Why would Iowans even care if the candidates don't stop here?

This is being billed as an effort to save states money and energy in polling and advertising, but this bill will make millions of Iowa votes null and void. It silences millions of Iowa voices and it is amazing that Democrats think this bill gives Iowa a bigger voice.

Iowa has 7 Electoral College votes and has had the first in the nation caucuses since 1972.

Let your voice be heard. Every vote counts. Contact your senator at 515-281-3371 or via e-mail: http://www3.legis.state.ia.us/ga/legislators.do?ch=s&ga=83 Sign the petition against this bill at http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/DisenfranchisementofIowaVoters/

Around the Capitol This Week

2009-02-20T06:19:00.000-08:00

Senator Shawn Hamerlinck (middle) with nursing students from St. Ambrose Univerity.

The ISU Statesmen singing in the rotunda

Senator David Johnson with members of Pheasants Forever and Iowa Conservation Alliance.

Senator Wieck at the Oversight Committee hearing of the treatment of men at the Atalissa plant

And we're throwing this lovely quote in just because we like it and it seems very appropriate at this time.

"I don't think at a time when everybody is stressed is a time to be taking more money out of people's pockets," Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal said. "I think it's unlikely we're going to pursue a gas tax increase. I think we're going to focus on ... the resources we have."

Title: Gronstal rules out gas tax for flood relief
Telegraph Herald (Dubuque, IA) - Saturday, June 28, 2008

Top Ten List

2009-02-18T08:53:00.000-08:00

Top 10 doctors that will see a dramatic increase in their patient load after the Democrats pass the Doctor Shopping Bill:

10) Doc. Martens
9) Doctor Tom (Davis)
8) Doctor J.
7) Doctor Feelgood
6) Doctor Doolittle
5) Doctor Zhivago
4) Doctor Dre
3) Doctor Pepper
2) Doctor Scholl's
1) Doctor Seuss

Every Vote Counts…..for Now

2009-02-17T13:49:00.000-08:00

Senate Democrats are examining a bill that would make every vote cast in Iowa for Presidential elections null and void. The bill, SSB 1128, hasn’t yet made it out of committee and is known as the Popular Vote Bill. The bill (if it becomes law) would mean that Iowa’s Electoral College votes would immediately turn into and go the way of the popular vote for President. So if Iowa votes for a Democrat for President, it doesn’t matter because if the entire East Coast votes for a Republican, Iowa’s Electoral votes automatically go to the Republican candidate.

Forget having any clout with the Iowa Caucuses. Why bother? Candidates would spend less time, money and energy in Iowa.

Millions of Iowan’s votes wouldn’t count for anything if this bill passes. This is a winner-take-all state of mind that stifles the voice of millions of people. And the fact that Democrats are even entertaining the idea is pretty scary.

Want to Get Involved in the Process?

2009-02-17T10:02:00.000-08:00

If you feel strongly about forced school consolidation and that small town schools are valuable assets to Iowa communities, sign the petition to stop/prevent it:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/SaveOurSmallSchools/

Unnecessary Wage Discrimination Bill Passes in Senate

2009-02-16T15:15:00.000-08:00

Senate File 137 passed today in the Senate and the bill would make it easier to sue employers in Iowa. This just adds another layer of anti-business legislation coming out of the Capitol this session.
Click here to listen to remarks by Republican Senators on the bill.

Forced School Consolidation Bad for Iowa

2009-02-16T12:45:00.000-08:00

A Democrat from Des Moines introduced a proposal last week that would force the rapid consolidation of all school districts with less than 750 students enrolled. This would affect 216 out of the 364 school districts in Iowa.

Senator Matt McCoy (D-Des Moines) implies that keeping these schools open is too costly for Iowans. However, it costs taxpayers $167.30 less per pupil to send a student to a school district with an enrollment of less than 750 students, which is on average $7879.10 per pupil, than it does to send a student to one of Iowa’s five largest schools, which costs on average $8046.40 per pupil.

Iowa’s small schools are a great asset for our communities and state. Small schools provide high quality educational services for students. In fact, a greater percentage of 11th grade students in Iowa’s 50 smallest schools are proficient in math and reading than students in Iowa’s 50 largest schools.

Small schools also have a high success rate of keeping their kids in school through graduation. For the 2007-2008 school year, the average dropout rate for schools with enrollment under 750 was 1.1%. During the same amount of time, the average dropout rate for Iowa’s five largest schools was 4.3%.

While it is always important that we look for methods to be more efficient in all areas receiving taxpayer money, we should not immediately look to the schools that are, in most cases, providing the best education in Iowa, and force them to make unnecessary changes.

For audio from the Senate floor of Senator David Johnson (R-Ocheyedan) asking Senator McCoy (D-Des Moines) about his proposal, click here.

You'll See These Posters Around the State Soon

2009-02-13T09:52:00.000-08:00

Week 5 Wrap-up

2009-02-12T14:29:00.000-08:00

This week at the Capitol, legislators dealt with increased taxes and possibly changing labor laws.
The Dr. Shopping bill was rushed out of committee this week and if passed would give workers injured on the job the ability to visit multiple doctors until they receive their desired diagnosis. This will result in a 14% increase in the cost in workers compensation insurance to employers in Iowa. This bill will have huge ramifications on schools and businesses in this state. It will put undue strain on the taxpayer and as a result, employers could potentially reduce benefits and institute layoffs. Injured workers already have many options – we don’t need to fix a system that is not broken.

Also on the horizon is the gas tax. Democrats in the House and Senate filed bills to raise the tax by 4 cents upon the Governor’s signing and another 4 cents by January 1, 2010. This tax is designed to improve roads and tax people traveling through the state, but Iowans already contribute to the Road Use Tax Fund, an increased license fee that passed last year. This bill has been controversial and I will be sure to keep you updated on it.

Finally, in an effort to rid the state of inefficiency, a Democrat proposal was introduced in the Senate that would effectively close every rural school in Iowa with 750 pupils or less. Taking away local control of the issue and forced consolidation is not the answer to inefficiency. Rural schools are top performers in education in Iowa and the lifeblood of the state.

On a lighter note, the 13th Annual Child Congress has been meeting in Des Moines this week. Today, they were at the Capitol, meeting with legislators and talking about early childhood care and programs. Pictured at left are Senate Republican Leader Paul McKinley, Republican Whip Steve Kettering and Senator James Seymour with representative from early childhood education programs.

In Honor of Valentine’s Day Coming Up

2009-02-10T11:08:00.000-08:00

Seeing red all over the Capitol

Red eye – the color of staff’s eyes after late night debate
Red headed stepchild in Iowa – property taxes
Red Red Wine – what the Republican staffers will want to drink after the session is over
Red State – what Iowa really really wants to be again
Red Lighted – all Republican budget ideas
Red Sox – Marshall’s license plate
Red Hot Issue – selling the Lottery
Red Handed – Democrats were caught scooping money out of the cookie jar
Orville REDenbacher – official sponsor of late night snacks at the Capitol
Red Tape – Democrats have bought a bunch of new rolls ready to wrap around businesses in this state
Red Flags – what went up when we read the Governor’s budget
Red Herring – the Dove Hunting bill to take attention away from the budget
Red Carpet – being rolled out by Democrats for their union thugs in Iowa
Parting the Red Sea – what Democrats think Obama will do to fix their spending habits
Red Tag Sale – what Iowa will have to hold thanks to the budget problem
Red Roof Inn – the only hotel that Iowans can afford after Democrats spent all their money
Red Letter Day – today: 60 degrees and sunny in February

Does Iowa Really Need a Gas Tax?

2009-02-09T12:58:00.000-08:00

Senator Randy Feenstra (R-Hull) did some great research on the gas tax in Iowa. He has put it all together and posted it on his website: http://www.newgenerationrepublican.com/. We couldn't have said it better ourselves.

Overview
Iowa’s gas tax is 22 cents per gallon. Currently, Iowa ranks 32nd in total state tax on gasoline. Our state neighbors are as follows:
Missouri 17.6 cents per gallon
South Dakota 24 cents per gallon
Minnesota 25.6 cents per gallon
Nebraska 26.9 cents per gallon
Wisconsin 32.9 cents per gallon
(Total state taxes including other taxes applied to fuel such as sales tax)
The Iowa Democrat party is deliberating about adding 10-12 cents per gallon. If this were to occur, Iowa would jump to one of the top 10 highest states in the nation for gas tax. (dime increase would raise $220 million annually)

What has been done so far?
The Iowa Legislature in the 2007-2008 session realized a possible funding shortage and passed a bill called “Time 21” This legislation called for increasing license fees on all motorized vehicles to offset this shortfall. Its goal was to achieve an extra $200 million in funds annually by 2012. (17.5% increase over 2008 amount)
This will be a significant fee increase for each vehicle owner. ($20-$60) We have not gone an entire year under this new regulation so no one is sure how much of an increase this will have to the DOT. The question arises do we need even more tax money for road building and rebuilding?

What is most likely to occur in 2009?
The federal government is looking to pass an $817 billion dollar stimulus package; Iowa is in line for approximately $1.3 billion of this money. The governor along with Senator Harkin has stated that this money will go toward infrastructure, specifically road infrastructure. If this occurs, the state roads will see some significant improvements, and the DOT short-fall will be immediately wiped out!

Also, the governor is requesting a $700 million dollar bonding package for infrastructure, again, most of this money would go toward new roads or the rebuilding of current roads. Again, this would wipe out the funding shortage.

Finally, the federal government is also talking about a 20 cent per gallon gas tax increase. A portion of this money from the federal government would go back to the state for its roads projects. (Payment to the RUT fund could be over $225 million of additional dollars per year) Another, way to wipe out the funding short-fall.

Remember, if one of these items would occur, Time 21 funding will be more than sufficient to keep up with road projects going forward.

You can read the full article on his blog, just visit his web site. Thank you , Senator Feenstra!

Seen Around the Capitol This Week

2009-02-06T13:45:00.000-08:00

Senator Reynolds talking with Jim Parker of the Golden Hills RCD.

Senator Feenstra talking with staffer Jim Friedrich.

Senator Boettger with her grandaughter.

Senator Noble with his intern, Nick Hinckle.

RIO Redecorates & Lottery Still on the Table

2009-02-05T12:22:00.000-08:00

The Rebuild Iowa Office has come under fire recently for, among other things, paying $19,000 in new carpet for their office.
RIO’s Chief of Staff says that “the little $3 million our office is using or the little 3 percent of CDBG funds (Community Development Block Grant), I don’t think your average Iowan sees that as an issue.”

Since when is $3 million a "little" and not an issue? Tell that to the people still living in FEMA trailers.
http://tinyurl.com/aoddbd

And as you may have herd – nothing ever dies at the Capitol. This includes the idea of selling Iowa’s assets. Some lawmakers are hell-bent on selling our lottery for quick cash. Maybe Democrats should address their addiction to spending before selling their revenue source.
http://tinyurl.com/bbhte2

Turning Teachers Into Food Police

2009-02-04T13:02:00.000-08:00

The Healthy Kids Act or House File 2279 passed by the legislature and was signed into law by the Governor last year. This act will create undo stress on our schools if implemented next school year. All but one Senate Republican voted against the bill and many people are calling upon the Department of Education to seriously consider what schools should spend their time and resources concentrating upon: student achievement or the lunch menu.

Iowa schools need to concentrate on teaching children rather than being the food police. This is a local control issue, and should be left to the discretion of the district. Many principals are outraged by the act and say it is too vague and has no accountability.

The bill requires students in grades 6-12 to complete 120 minutes of physical activity a week and kindergarten-5 graders must complete 30 minutes of physical activity a day. There are no stipulations as to what constitutes physical activity and students may participate in extra curricular activities, which are not monitored, to complete the requirement. As of right now, band and show choir would qualify under physical activities.

A lot of time has been spent talking about how Iowa’s education system is slipping in the national ranks and how we need to get Iowa kids sufficiently educated so they can compete in a global marketplace. This bill is drawing attention away from instructional time in the classroom and into the cafeteria.

The price of school lunches will increase as the strict nutritional standards recommended by the Healthy Kids Task Force will force the cost of the average school lunch to increase by 36 cents. Schools will be forced to pass the increased cost to the family. This is yet another demonstration of the Democrats' willingness to increase the cost of living in Iowa.

The Department of Education must make a decision regarding the rules of the Healthy Kids Act by June 2009. Educators are left wondering how they will implement the guidelines, hold students accountable and what happened to the emphasis on reading, writing and arithmetic.

Assault on Right-to-Work, Round Two

2009-02-03T11:10:00.001-08:00

Democrats are once again renewing their assault on Iowa’s status as a right-to-work state by reviving the so called “fair share” issue that died in the 2007 legislative session. That bill passed the Senate but was never considered in the House after it became clear that Democrats didn’t have the votes to pass it. This week, Governor Culver appears ready to file an executive branch bill in an effort to change the law. Word on the street is that he’s already talked to the unions and had his team do the research and write the bill. They’re just waiting to file it.

According to reports, this bill will apply to all employees in a union shop both public and private, and will actually include a repeal of part of Iowa’s right-to-work law. According to a poll by the respected Research 2000 firm, Iowans support right-to-work by 78%. And according to the Des Moines Register, only about 10-12% of Iowa workers are in a union.

Proponents of “fair share” make the claim that if a union negotiates with an employer for wages and benefits for all employees then it is only fair that all employees get charged for this service, even those that don’t belong to the union. This is a red herring and unions are not, in fact, forced to negotiate for all employees, they must only do so when they become the “exclusive bargaining unit.” This status must be applied for and is not required. Almost all unions choose to apply for exclusive status because of the advantage it gives them at the bargaining table. Thus they are only required to represent all employees in return for this advantage, which is really only fair.

This latest effort is a bold attempt at forced unionization and an outright repeal of right-to-work. If Democrats succeed in this effort they will be able to use dues from non-union members to pursue their legislative agenda. The result will be an increase in the already undue influence over elected officials wielded by union organizers. This will also be a huge turn-off for potential employers looking to set up shop in Iowa and that is the last thing the state needs right now.

The Shell Game

2009-02-02T12:32:00.000-08:00

The shell game that is the Governor’s budget continues and you can bet your bottom dollar that Iowans will see property tax increases in the very very near future. Thank you, Governor Culver. This is reading between the lines as well as seeing the writing on the wall. The Governor’s budget clearly outlines cutting $49.9 million in reimbursements from the Homestead Property Tax credit. The Department of Revenue wants $139.1 for FY 2010. How in the world will an $89.2 million difference be made up? Well property tax increases, of course.

The governor’s budget has a 6.5% cut in it, but remember, government has grown overall the last few years so the cut isn’t as deep as you may think. Stay tuned for more….

Groundhog Day

2009-02-02T08:00:00.001-08:00

Punxsutawney Phil Sees shadow: Democrats to continue spending.

The Slippery Slope

2009-01-30T13:35:00.000-08:00

Even though our governor has gone on record, repeatedly, against this issue, it looks like it's sticking around. Need to make up that deficit (yes, it is a deficit, despite what some may tell you) somehow. Maybe we'll see some party fireworks in the near future.....
http://tinyurl.com/apo89o

Seen Around the Capitol This Week

2009-01-30T09:26:00.000-08:00

Senator James Hahn (R-Muscatine) talking to Community College students.

Senator Shawn Hamerlinck (R-Davenport) talks with a Davenport group.

Republican Leader Paul McKinley (R-Chariton) at his weekly press conference.

Senator David Johnson (R-Ocheyedan) talks with NW Iowa Community College students.

Herd at the Capitol today: "I can't find where my Twitter is."

Lets Talk Turkey

2009-01-29T13:25:00.000-08:00

The Governor’s budget went public this week and people at the Capitol are still trying to wrap their brains around it all. Before we jump into the details lets keep in mind that legislative Democrats are the ones who spent Iowa into this mess. They are quick to blame ole George W. Bush on the woes of economy and getting us in this economic mess, but so we’re clear, the Democrats in Iowa have been spending money like it is going out of style. For every dollar taken in, they’ve spent $1.50. At that rate, it’s no wonder we need to dip into our reserve funds and the 6.5% cut the Big Lug is proposing is the tip of the iceberg.

The Governor’s budget eliminates the following seven funds:
Senior Living Trust Fund, Healthy Iowans Tobacco Trust, Crime Victim Compensation, Attorney General’s Forfeiture Fund, Property Tax Credit Fund, Gambler’s Treatment Fund, Child Care Tax Credit Fund

He’s increasing spending by 2.4% or $147.7 million. Total General Fund expenditures: $6.211 billion for FY 2010. Someone explain to us how all this talk of tightening belts and doing more with less fits into this spending increase.

He’s shifting funds around: $200 million from reserves, $6.5 from the Gambler Assistance Fund (then he’ll eliminate it) and $10 million from the Federal Economic Stimulus and Job Handling Fund. Shifting monies does not mean replenishment will ever happen.

He also doesn’t want to give Medicaid as much money as last year. $22.9 million less to be exact.

The Governor is banking on the feds handing us money from the economic stimulus package which is fine, but we can’t do this every year, so lets not get used to it.
Here is a tribute to what we all wish for, even governors:
http://tinyurl.com/9jlkde

The Flood Bill Breakdown – What you won’t hear

2009-01-28T16:26:00.000-08:00

One of the first major bills of this legislative session just passed in the Senate. HF 64 takes $56 million from Iowa’s reserve funds and puts it toward disaster relief. Here’s the breakdown: $10 million going towards individuals affected by flooding. Residents may apply for grants of up to $2,500 going toward replacing lost personal items. The bill also devotes $24 million total in the form of forgivable housing loans for housing assistance and the final piece of the bill is $22 million total available in the form of grants to assist local municipalities.

A big part of this bill is the establishment of the Rebuild Iowa Office. The office was established after the floods and has been borrowing staff from other departments. This bill puts in place 32 full time employees through this office with no end in sight as to when the office will disband. Seeing as this was a 500 year flood, you’d think it would be reasonable to assume that Iowa could use the office, get rid of it and not see it for another 50 years. Not so, the bill sets it up into perpetuity.

The office will be charged with finding “innovative” financing alternatives. Take that for what you will.

What about any left over money? It is possible. Senate Republicans offered and amendment that would require leftovers to go towards small businesses since they get the short end of the stick on this issue. It was voted down.

Another strenuous point in the bill is the $2,500 for individual assistance. No stipulations other than to get it, you have to be affected by the floods. The money will come in the form of voucher debit cards. This is ripe for abuse as we all know from Hurricane Katrina.

We still don’t know a dollar amount of the damage statewide. No one seems to want to cough up the numbers. You’d think that might be important when talking about funding something. There are still millions of dollars sitting in the RIO coughers (from the feds) waiting to get into the hands of Iowans.

Regardless of what you think of the bill, victims have waited a long time to get some relief from the state. It could have happened much sooner and hopefully all the bureaucracy written into the bill can easily be weeded through so those in need came pull through. I guess we’ll wait and see how it all unfolds.

Small Towns Get the Shaft

2009-01-27T16:11:00.000-08:00

The Local Option Sales Tax bill passed in the Senate tonight. It would mean areas hit by disasters can expedite the referendum process by giving the residents of disaster areas the power to vote on imposing a tax to help meet local needs, not necessarily flood relief.
If this is for flood damage, why are they making it so hard for small towns that were impacted by the flood to get this money?

Small towns will have to pool with larger towns to get in on the action. Since the process is expedited from 120 days down to 30, these smaller downs won’t have enough time to get their resources together. Why should small towns have less ability to apply for flood relief damage?

This tax allows Polk, Johnson and Linn to help themselves to this tax. And besides, why do we want to tax these areas hit hardest by flooding? Since when do taxes ease any sort of burden?

It was herd during debate from the Democrats that this money is not restricted to flood relief in any way. So that means that since the tax doesn’t sunset the money can be used for who knows what next year? Can anyone say Project Destiny?

In Light of the Governor's Recent Budget Announcement......

2009-01-27T08:07:00.000-08:00

The news from the Revenue Estimating Conference (REC) last month regarding the state’s finances, while sobering, comes as no shock. Legislative Republicans have been calling for a slow and steady approach to the state’s budget over the past two years. Legislative Democrats, unfortunately, chose not to listen and have run the state’s budget aground.

Legislative Republicans, along with the non-partisan Legislative Service Agency, have been ringing the alarm regarding the Democrats’ budget. The current economic slowdown and downturn was forecast in 2007 yet nobody in the majority party paid attention to the warning siren.

Des Moines Register
“Traditionally, Iowa has always lagged the national economy.”
-Dennis Prouty, director of the Legislative Services Agency 12/13/06

The Gazette
“We’ve got an upward motion. It’s not a real strong motion, and I think from everything I’m reading it could be starting to slow down.”
-Dennis Prouty, director of the Legislative Services Agency 12/13/06

This is the first indication from the non-partisan Legislative Services Agency that the economy would be slowing down. Remember, the individual warning us that the economy, overall, would slowing down is from a non-partisan office.

The Gazette
“Democrats will be fiscally responsible. I think people are going to be very cautious about that. We need to keep that mantra up.”
-Representative Mary Mascher, D-Iowa City 1/7/07

By chanting the desire that Democrats in Des Moines would be fiscally responsible does not mean it will actually happen.

Des Moines Register
“I’ve got some real concerns about how we’re going to accomplish some of the proposals that are around with where the revenue numbers stand.”
-State Auditor David Vaudt 1/21/07

Des Moines Register
“Iowans are right to expect us to be smart with a buck, and to balance our checkbook the same way they do.”
-Governor Chet Culver 1/21/07

If your accountant tells you that he does not know how you are going to balance your checkbook you have got a serious problem.

Telegraph Herald
“We need to be guided in this budget by actual numbers. Numbers don’t lie. Smoke and mirrors games and gimmicks just don’t work.”
-Governor Chet Culver 1/30/07

Telegraph Herald
“Iowa common sense is our best guide for budgeting. Simply put, we cannot spend more than we take in.”
-Governor Chet Culver 1/30/07

Well Governor, if you are the average Iowa family you are right. You cannot spend more than you take in. Unfortunately for the taxpayer you and your tax-and-spend liberal allies operate the State’s checkbook.

Telegraph Herald
“We must always realize we can’t possibly fund all the budget requests made of us. Difficult and painful decisions are required.”
-Governor Chet Culver 1/31/07

Telegraph Herald
“He’s made more promises than he can deliver. It’s a lot of spending.”
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants R-Sioux City 1/31/07

Des Moines Register
“We’ve got to bring this back into balance.”
-State Auditor David Vaudt 2/23/07

Des Moines Register
“I think we’re being responsible, and this is the beginning of the budget process.”
-Governor Chet Culver 2/23/07

Des Moines Register
“They’re hiding the truth from Iowans.”
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants R-Sioux City 2/23/07

While the State Auditor is telling the Governor and Legislature that the budget is out of balance, the Democrats continue their smoke and mirrors games.

The Gazette
“I keep reading articles that a recession is coming. There definitely are indications that things are softening. I don’t see tremendous growth for Iowa.”
-David Underwood, member of the Revenue Estimating Conference 4/7/07

The Gazette
“This certainly is a warning that I think we’re spending too much this session, and that as we see an economic slowdown you’re setting yourself up for a whopper of a tax increase that’s absolutely going to kill job creation in this state.”
-Former Senator Jeff Angelo R-Creston 4/7/07

A full year-and-a-half before the downturn in tax receipts the Democrats were warned by the REC and the Republicans regarding their reckless spending.

The Gazette
“Balancing the budget is my top priority. Keeping our fiscal house in order is a priority and it has not been a part of our budgeting proprieties.”
-Governor Chet Culver 4/24/07

Des Moines Register
“We probably spent a little too much this session.”
-Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal D-Council Bluffs 4/29/07

The Governor and the leader of the Iowa Senate better get on the same page of talking points. How can you keep your fiscal house in order if you have spent too much money?

The Gazette
“We’ve been expecting a downturn in the economy. We’re expecting it will occur at some point. The question is when.”
-Charles Krogmeier, director of the Department of Management 10/10/07

The Gazette
“They’re still going to be hundreds of millions of dollars short in making their budget balance.”
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants R-Sioux City 10/10/07

So a year before the downturn in tax receipts the Democrats were warned again by the REC and the Republicans regarding their spending spree.

Des Moines Register
"I truly believe we can do what we need to do if we curtail spending."
-Former Senate Minority Leader Ron Wieck, R-Sioux City 1/13/08

Des Moines Register
"You can't increase spending by $1 billion in a year where you just don't have that kind of revenue coming in."
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City 1/13/08

Des Moines Register
“We're sitting on a ticking time bomb on this budget."
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City 1/13/08

Des Moines Register
“There will be no shortfall.”
-House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, D-Des Moines 1/15/08

Des Moines Register
“There is no reason Iowans should fear this economic situation.”
-Governor Chet Culver 1/29/08

A full 10 months before the downturn of receipts Republican Legislators are telling their colleagues that they need to stop their spending spree. The response from Democratic leadership and the Governor: a pat on the head and a “do not worry about it.”

The Hawk Eye
“We will continue keeping our commitment to put together another fiscally responsible budget and fully fund the state’s savings accounts.”
-Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs 4/5/08

The Gazette
“We’re going to try to keep our belt tight.”
-Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs 4/5/08

The Hawk Eye
"My concern is that (these revenues) won't hold up long term. That's why it shouldn't go into ongoing spending. I don't see us being able to maintain long-term growth."
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City 4/5/08

We are now six months before this downturn yet the Democrats continue to increase their spending with total disregard for the law. To feed their spending frenzy they “not withstand” the law so they can spend additional money. This is all done while we are told they are tightening their belts.

The Gazette
"Spending is just out of hand, and there are a lot of us in our caucus that think that has to stop.”
-Former Senate Minority Leader Ron Wieck, R-Sioux City 4/12/08

The Gazette
“It looks to me like spending more money and growing government is the most important thing around here, and I think we need a new attitude about it."
-Former Senate Minority Leader Ron Wieck, R-Sioux City 4/26/08

At the end of session, Republican Leadership continued to sound the alarm with no response as the Democrats voted along a party line to pass an unsustainable budget.

State Auditor’s Report
The Governor’s proposed 2009 budget “represents a significant step backward in terms of transparency and fiscal responsibility.”
-Auditor David Vaudt 5/28/08

So much for the Governor’s promise of a “no smoke and mirror budget.”

Des Moines Register
"The general caution is that the economy of the country has slowed considerably over the last six months, and Iowa won't avoid that."
-Jeff Robinson, a senior legislative analyst for the Iowa Legislative Services Agency. 8/27/08

Des Moines Register
"We cautioned them that we should be more careful and not overextend the taxpayers. I guess a price will be paid now for the Democrats overspending; if that is inability to deal with flood relief or to have to go back and make adjustments to the budget."
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City 8/27/08

Still several months prior to the downturn and the Democrats refused to call a special session to deal with this coming crisis.

Des Moines Register
"It will be very difficult for the governor to develop a budget and departments to develop budgets. And the Legislature will have to make some difficult decisions."
-Holly Lyons, fiscal services division director, Legislative Services Agency 10/10/08

Des Moines Register
“It is absolutely delusional to say that everything is fine. It is not fine. Somebody has got to stand up and start telling the truth. I don't care how many times Pat Murphy and Chet Culver say it's fine. These guys are more concerned about their election than they are about the fiscal health of the state."
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City 10/10/08

The Gazette
"The governor needs to take action now. He has an actual deficit and every day that goes by reduces his options.”
-Former House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City 10/15/08

The Gazette
“Obviously we’re going to have to tighten our belts.”
-Governor Chet Culver 10/15/08

The Governor now tells us that state government will have to tighten it’s belt. Unfortunately for the taxpayer it is a day late and a dollar short. In addition, it seems as though the previous “belt tightening” did not work; the question becomes how tight was that belt before?

Des Moines Register
"As people across the state and around the world face tough economic times, it is critical that government is fiscally responsible and living within its means, just like Iowa families must do each and every day."
-Governor Chet Culver 10/10/08

Governor, families in this state have been living within their means. Iowa’s government has not.

Transparency and Accountability

2009-01-26T14:35:00.000-08:00

Transparency and accountability. You’ll hear that a lot in the next few months. Senate Republicans are already using those two lovely nouns as they talk about the government and how it functions. Last week they introduced a bill that would provide both by establishing a web site where the public could log on and see exactly how their tax dollars are being spent. The hope is that these words will catch on and people will start to question things.

So what’s this burgeoning trend all about? Lets shed some light on the matter. Here are the definitions. Transparency: made visible by a light behind it. Accountability: responsible; required to account for. Pretty simple. The more we question our government, the more transparency and accountability we have. The government works for us, after all, and not the other way around.

Remember those two words throughout this session when you hear about how government is growing and flood relief money is being doled out. If you forget, we’ll be sure to remind you.

Heard at the Capitol today: “These bleeding-heart liberals think we need to take care of everyone in Iowa.”

Veterans Day at the Capitol

2009-01-23T13:13:00.001-08:00

It was Veterans Day at the Capitol yesterday and the building was filled with veterans of all ages from around the state. It was great to see them all and let them know how much we appreciate their service and sacrifice.

IF IT FLIES IT DIES!

2009-01-22T12:44:00.000-08:00

SF 25, was introduced this week. The bill will allow the Iowa Natural Resource Commission to establish an open season for hunting mourning doves. If you support this bill contact Mike Gronstal at michael.gronstal@legis.state.ia.us, and ask him to get the bill flying out of the Senate!

Transparency Comes to Iowa

2009-01-21T13:12:00.000-08:00

Today Senator Kim Reynolds (R-Osceola) and Senator Shawn Hamerlinck (R-Davenport) announced their support of improving government transparency through the implementation of a new website that would shed light on how taxpayer dollars are spent in Iowa.

Senators Hamerlinck and Reynolds, along with some of their House counterparts, are sponsoring the Iowa Transparency bill. It would require the Iowa Department of Management to develop and operate a website where citizens could see how their tax dollars are being spent. The bill would also require the DOM to work with the Department of Revenue to develop and operate a searchable database and map of all the tax rates in the state for each jurisdiction. The database would also have a tax rate calculator able to compute potential and future taxes.

On average Iowans pay more than $4,700 per person in taxes a year and creating a user-friendly site where they can know where their hard-earned dollars are going is a step in the right direction of creating a more open and honest government. This is on the heels of yesterday’s inauguration of President Obama. As a U.S. Senator, Obama pushed hard for a more transparent government. (Great tie-in right?)

This bill is a great way to hold government accountable. We entrust the government with our tax dollars and the public should know exactly how it is spent. It is a truly bipartisan move. Regardless of party, people want to know where their taxes are going.

The implementation of an Iowa Transparency web site would probably cost less than $40,000. (Missouri implemented theirs for $35,000). The software is available from the federal government and already implemented in several states, including Missouri, and we’re hearing that it is a success there. A little bit of money for a whole lot of accountability and transparency.

Former Senator Dies

2009-01-20T09:56:00.000-08:00

This weekend, former state legislator Mary Lundby lost her battle with cervical cancer. The Republican legislator had a huge impact on state politics during her time at the Capitol. She served in the House of Representatives as well as the Senate. Not everyone agreed with her political views but everyone respected her and she will be missed. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Lundby family.

Obituary for Mary Lundby
Mary Adelaide Lundby, 60, of 1240 14th St., Marion, ended her battle with cancer on Saturday, January 17, 2009, at Mercy Medical Center in Cedar Rapids.

The funeral will be on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, at 1:00 p.m., at St. Joseph Catholic Church in Marion, by Father John Gossman. Her ashes will be spread over her beloved land in Belle Plaine at a later date. Arrangements by Murdoch Funeral Home & Cremation Center in Marion.

Survivors include husband, Michael Lundby of Marion; her son, Daniel Lundby of New York City; her mother, Elizabeth Hoehl; her sisters, Margaret Hoehl, Susan Hoehl, and Paula Jensen; her brother, David Hoehl; her mother-on-law, Mildred Lundby; and many nieces, nephews, and cousins. She was preceded in death by her father, Edward Hoehl and her father-in-law, Lorence Lundby.

Mary was born February 2, 1948, in Carroll, Iowa. She graduated from Carroll Kuemper Catholic High School in 1966 and Upper Iowa University in 1971. On December 27, 1971, Mary married Michael Lundby at St. Lawrence Catholic Church in Carroll, Iowa. They made their home in Marion, where they raised their son, Daniel.

Mary was a wife, mother, and a legislator. Mary was elected to the State Legislature in 1986. She was an advocate for issues concerning children, families, the environment and conservation. She loved being a legislator and was happy to have been given the privilege of serving the people of Marion, Linn County, and the State of Iowa.

In lieu of flowers, memorials may be directed to: the Iowa National Heritage Foundation, 505 Fifth Ave., Suite 444, Des Moines, IA 50309-2321 or the Madge Phillips Foundation, Waypoint, 318 Fifth Street SE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52401.

Democrat to English Dictionary

2009-01-15T14:39:00.000-08:00

“Cigarette Tax Increase”- A trick meant to make the public believe Democrats cared about their health, while in reality they needed the money to cover their spending habits

“Fair Share”- A sad, pathetic, misleading term to force people to join a union against their will

“Fee increase”- a tax increase dressed in disguise

“Fiscal Responsibility”- A campaign trick phrase Democratic candidates use to attempt to lure moderate Republican and Independent voters to their side

“Iowa’s economy faces serious challenges due to the worst national economic crisis since the great depression”- Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain who spent taxpayer money like a drunken sailor driving us into a $600 million hole

“Labor Union”- Term for Democrats who contribute large sums of money to other Democrats

“Notwithstanding”- A common word a Democrat uses to get around the law

“Not Germane”- Any Republican germane amendment that Democrats don’t want to vote on

“Open Meeting”- A public meeting held after all the terms have been agreed upon behind closed doors by Democrats and their special interest groups

“Teacher’s Union”- Democratic politician training ground and funding source

“We have balanced our budget”- A slight of hand trick performed by moving hundreds of millions of dollars off budget

“We need bipartisan support”- We are afraid to vote for this issue on our own for fear of not getting re-elected

One of Those Days

2009-01-14T13:22:00.000-08:00

Working at the Capitol isn't for everybody and sometimes it can drive you to distraction. Looks like one of us is way too wrapped up in their work in the mornings.

State of the State Leaves us in a State

2009-01-13T15:03:00.000-08:00

Governor Culver gave his annual State of the State address today, primarily focusing on disaster relief in Iowa. He even showed a dynomite video to illistrate the disaster hardships Iowans have faced. This professional piece of videography leaves us scratching our heads as to how it was paid for. Hopefully some secret donor was nice enough to cough up the cash, but that's doubtful. So as some Iowans will never live in their houses again or see their businesses rebuilt, they can rest assured that a fancy video documenting their hardships was made for posterity. Money well-spent, no doubt.......

Culver also placed a lot of blame. He blamed the feds for getting us into this economic mess and in the next breath advocated for teamwork and consensus from both parties in 2009. Legislators remain in the dark and have yet to see his budget and details of the Rebuild Iowa plan that he wants so desperately to pass as soon as possible. We'll see how that goes.

One thing we can agree on with the governor is using the state’s rainy day funds to the tune of 43 million dollars in flood and disaster recovery. This should have happened sooner. In fact, we think he should have called a special session this summer to nip the problem in the bud instead of waiting till the ice and snow are hard on the ground.

Here are some pictures from yesterday's swearing in ceremony.

Legislative Lingo for the First Day of Session

2009-01-12T12:52:00.000-08:00

Thanks to Todd Dorman for this great primer on legislative lingo

Dorman: A primer on legislative lingo you'll hear this year
By Todd Dorman The Gazette
In four days, the Iowa Legislature returns to the Statehouse. I'm too excited to sleep. And in order to understand the Legislature's customs and rituals, it helps to speak fluent lawmaker. So I've compiled this short glossary of legis-speak, freshly updated for 2009. I've come across many new additions to the language listening to leaders and lawmakers in recent days.

Bipartisan — A thoughtful invitation to the minority party to join the majority in a politically suicidal act. Example: "We hope our dear friends across the aisle will join us in a bipartisan effort to pass a whopping tax hike."

Challenging — We have no flippin' idea how to solve all these problems. Synonym: "Screwed."

Daunting — Seriously, we have no idea. 50-50 chance — It would take a miracle for that to happen.

Infrastructure — A long, impressive-sounding word, usually paired with words like "crumbling," and used to answer a wide array of tough questions. How do we improve the economy? "Infrastructure." Why do we need to raise taxes? "Infrastructure." How do we attract new business? "Infrastructure." Why did you forget our anniversary? "Infrastructure."

Innovation — New 2009 definition: The act of coming up with crazy moneymaking schemes at the end of a session when lawmakers realize they can't balance the budget with conventional tricks and dodges. Example: "Let's lease the lottery and put keno in bars and sell naming rights to state agencies, like the 'Department of Agriculture, Presented by Monsanto' and the 'Outback Statehouse.'" Now that's innovation.

Job creation — New 2009 definition: Raising the gas tax. Example: "It's not a tax increase, it's job creation."

Lack of consensus — An excuse for shelving something a lawmaker really didn't want to do in the first place. Example: "I share your deep concerns about this issue, but doggone it, there's just a lack of consensus."

Long term — A period that begins after a politician leaves office. See also Short term — The time between now and the next election.

Middle class — Everyone in Iowa, with the exception of the truly needy and the obscenely wealthy.

Move quickly — Legislative action will probably occur in your lifetime. See also "glacial" and "molasses."

Eternally optimistic — Things don't look so good. Synonym: "Denial."

Quite frankly — A phrase often used by a lawmaker who is trying very hard to avoid being frank. Example: "Quite frankly, I'm eternally optimistic."

Rainy day fund — A magic $620 million fund that can cover more than $1 gazillion in promises.

Revenue enhancements — Tax increases. Example: "Hey, let's pick up people by the ankles and shake some revenue enhancements out of their pockets."

Washington — A mysterious city to the east that can be blamed for all problems.
We'll take a look at that — A phrase used to describe something dead.

Some Things Don't Change

2009-01-09T08:44:00.000-08:00

Labor unions are, once again, trying to put the squeeze on taxpayers:
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090109/NEWS10/901090353

Democrat Agenda Will Hit Iowa Where it Hurts

2009-01-07T14:07:00.000-08:00

Today legislative leaders from the Democrat party announced their priorities for the 83rd General Assembly which convenes next week. At the top of their list is raising the compulsory drop-out age to 18 and raising the gas tax.

The Democrat’s agenda items are misguided. Iowa is facing an economic recession of major proportions and lawmakers need to focus on finding ways to help Iowans keep and find jobs, make it easier for small businesses to stay in business and find ways for Iowans to keep more of their hard-earned money. Raising taxes in tough economic times is a swift kick by the Democrat politicians in Des Moines to the pocketbooks of Iowans.

GOP legislators are challenging their counterparts to scrutinize every state dollar spent this coming fiscal year. These tough times call for fiscal responsibility. Democrats are in denial when it comes to budgetary matters by stating there is no deficit. There is, after all, a $600 million budget shortfall and money does not grow on trees. Where did all the money go? Well, to fund pet projects such as restoring a pipe organ in Clermont and to build a train depot in Dubuque where there is no train service.

The state has an obligation to maintain vitally important programs. Legislators have a responsibility to spend taxpayer money wisely. They cannot simply hand over money to be spent on programs without asking some tough questions. State organizations need to be forthcoming in how they spend the dollars they are allotted.

After two years and thousands of dollars, the Property Tax Interim Study Committee held their final meeting today and made their recommendations on easing the property tax burden for Iowans. Some of the committee’s suggestions include establishing a Commission on Smart Growth, raising hotel and motel taxes, raising franchise fees and establishing entertainment taxes. All the suggestions will burden Iowa families with more taxes.
Senate Republicans have been working hard to sound the alarm on out of control state spending and plan on working diligently this year by being a spending watchdog for the state and an advocate against higher taxes.

Iowa GOP Gets Serious About Spending

2009-01-06T07:35:00.000-08:00

Iowa GOP leaders are stepping up and calling for serious examination of state spending. The legislative session starts next week and we'll soon know if the Democratic Majority is listening or turning a blind eye to the out of control spending problem in Iowa.

To read more, follow the links:
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090106/NEWS10/901060352/1007/NEWS05

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090106/NEWS10/901060351/1007/NEWS05

2008-12-12T13:35:00.000-08:00

December Revenue Estimating Committee Meets
Budget predictions for 2009 and 2010 fall short

The Revenue Estimating Conference (REC), comprised of the Governor or their designee, the Director of the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, and a public member selected based upon their expertise, met this week.

The REC is estimating that State revenues will experience negative growth over the next two fiscal years, meaning the State will have less money to spend than in Fiscal Year 2008 as the REC decreased their earlier estimates for both FY 2009 and FY 2010.

Here are the numbers from the REC meeting:
FY 2009
-The estimate for FY 2009 is nearly $100 million less than the REC’s estimate in October.
-Total net receipts plus transfers for FY 2009, (money available to spend) is estimated to be $6,052.0 million.
-This equals a negative growth of $32.5 million as compared to FY 2008 actual receipts.
-If you plug the new estimate into a balance sheet; the State budget has a hole of $130 million for FY 2009, which is the budget year we are currently in.
-The Governor has proposed a total of $77 million worth of budget “savings”; He needs to look a little deeper because he is $53 million short of what is needed to balance the FY 2009 budget.

FY 2010
-The estimate for FY 2010 is nearly $133 million less than the REC’s estimate in October.
-Total net receipts plus transfers for FY 2010, (money available to spend) is estimated to be $6,025.8 million.
-This equals a negative growth of $26 million as compared to the REC estimate for FY 2009 actual receipts.
-If you plug the new estimate into a balance sheet and include the anticipated built-ins; the State budget has a hole of $690 million for FY 2010.

Responsible budgeting must be incorporated into every state-sponsored program when it comes to spending your money. The Democratic Majority cannot continue to dole out money for unsuccessful programs and projects that never come to fruition.

Senate Republicans will continue to fight for Iowa taxpayers by opposing the further raiding of the Senior Living Trust Fund, protecting the integrity of our savings accounts and voting against tax increases.